User talk:Editive

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Editive, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Mike Peel (talk) 23:17, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Profile boxes[edit]

How do I create the profile boxes you can see on the right side of most users' profile pages ? example: User:ConcernedVancouverite. Thank you for your help !

September 2018[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at TrumpiLeaks, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sagecandor (talk) 11:53, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that I simultaneously launched a discussion on the fact that the website seems inactive since it launched, so keep the disdainful messages for yourself and partake constructively. Best, Editive (talk) 23:45, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletion on "Kering" concerning possible tax evasion[edit]

Hi Editive. Please take care not to delete any information from articles that is backed by a reliable source. Doing this without explanation is more than against Wikipedia's set of unwritten rules. I have restored the section about possible tax evasion by Kering. Best, --Tischbeinahe (talk) 12:16, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi user who's only interested in leading a French intifada on one page. I removed your contribution because, as it states, it is only a "possible" accusation. And by judging how you insist on pushing this possible accusation, the intent of vandalism appears obvious. Please come back when the justice will validate or invalidate this accusation, because with or without sources, Wikipedia can't gather all accusations thrown by anyone out there. Editive (talk) 20:57, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

These are matters of international interest, as the raides trigged international reporting by the New York Times, Le Monde, Der Spiegel and other newspapers. The investigation is a fact and not disputed. Applying the rule of law is also not an intifada, nor is not a matter of shame for Kering. However if there is a future positive / negative outcome for Kering, we should definitely add this to the article. As a matter of fact, while your comment triggered me to do further research on this, I've also added the tax evasion scheme used by Kering to provide for Bizzarris salary. As I'm not a native speaker it would be very kind of you if you could check for spelling and grammar. Thanks in advance! --Tischbeinahe (talk) 11:10, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I must assume that you are paid by Kering to delete negative media coverage about the company and keep it's Wikipedia article "clean". Next time you delete objective information about the company that does not please your personal opinion I will ask a Wikipedia admin for help. --Tischbeinahe (talk) 18:35, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WP:SOCK, you only edit Wikipedia to add this chunk of content about an ongoing investigation, your intentions are obvious, and the broken English doesn't help. Editive (talk) 04:57, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, first off all, thanks for your edit of the article and pointing me to WP:NOTNEWS. I can see your point with the tax evasion investigation in Italy as matters there are not sortet out. However, Bizzarri's case was covered in major newspapers here in Europe and it's totally different from the investigations in Italy, so I've readded the short summary (because not everyone can read the German source) and the reference. Naimadia and me are not socks but friends IRL and he asked me for help, because he's not a regular editor here. I think that WP:EN can profit from investigative journalist work, even though the sources are German newspapers and not the NYT or Wapo. I do my best, to not make any grammar or spelling mistakes, but English is not my native language, so I very much appreciate your help. Best, --Tischbeinahe (talk) 07:46, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Editive. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hottinger[edit]

Hi, I notice you have done quite a lot of edit work on Hottinger. I am very inexperienced at wiki but I do have a lot of information, knowledge and documentation on the Hottinger business and family. I’d be happy to help.. Littlerock1991 (talk) 23:03, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Littlerock1991: Sorry I didn't notice your message earlier. I mostly follow rabbit holes on Wikipedia, that's what stimulates me most. But do share your info with me, I'll see if there's anything good to add. Editive (talk) 02:34, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paju Typography Institute[edit]

Hello, Editive

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Vexations and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've proposed an article that you started, Paju Typography Institute, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criteria and I believe that the article obviously and uncontroversially does not belong in an encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vexations}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vexations (talk) 13:34, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Terminal (company)[edit]

The article Terminal (company) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nothing but routine announcements. Does not pass WP:NCORP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:48, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bottega Veneta logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bottega Veneta logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Zegna logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Zegna logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]