User talk:Editor422

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Jane Antonia Cornish

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jane Antonia Cornish, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.janeantoniacornish.com/about-1/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:48, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jane Antonia Cornish

Hello Editor422,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jane Antonia Cornish for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. LowLevel73^(talk) 20:00, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jane Antonia Cornish may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Reynolds and Willem Dafoe. She has been nominated for Breakthrough Composer of the Year by the [http://filmmusiccritics.org International Film Music Critics Association<ref>http://

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:47, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jane Antonia Cornish

Hello Editor422,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jane Antonia Cornish for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. LowLevel73^(talk) 20:49, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Jane Antonia Cornish, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. LowLevel73^(talk) 20:49, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Jane Antonia Cornish. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. LowLevel73^(talk) 21:37, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Jane Antonia Cornish. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 02:22, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jane Antonia Cornish, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 17:17, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Jane Antonia Cornish shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 21:17, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Read and VERY carefully understand the contents of what constitutes a reliable source. Blog posts and promotional advertising are not to be used, and quotes need to be sourced to their original location.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 21:21, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Jane Antonia Cornish, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 17:10, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]