User talk:Editor800

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Airtran371 (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

October 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page AirTran Airways has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. by---->Javierito92 (Talk to me) 15:47, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on American Airlines. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Snoozlepet (talk) 15:51, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on AirTran Airways. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. WuhWuzDat 16:00, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at AirTran Airways. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Smashville^talk 16:04, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again[edit]

Once again, please stop adding false information to articles, despited repeated reversions and requests to stop. Your edits amount to vandalism, and continuing to do so will result in another block. Thanks. Jasepl (talk) 16:17, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Logan International Airport[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Logan International Airport. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Any further warring will lead to a much longer block than the last one. Mjroots (talk) 16:24, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SWA[edit]

Again - please stop adding volumes of trivial information to the Southwest Airlines article. As has been explained several times, a detailed listing for every new route planned or started is not encyclopaedic and does not belong in airline articles. Wikipedis is not a travel guide, or an medium for advertisement. Your edits have been revetred. Again. Jasepl (talk) 16:45, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again, STOP vandalising articles. Failing which, you and all your socks will be banned. Thanks. Jasepl (talk) 20:39, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy as a result of your repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} . Kuru ^talk 21:09, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

5RR at LaGuardia Airport; continued edit war at expiration of previous block for warring on same article. Kuru ^talk 21:09, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Snoozlepet (talk) 21:10, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on LaGuardia Airport. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Snoozlepet (talk) 21:10, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]