User talk:EditorInChiefSD

November 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Palestinian political violence was changed by EditorInChiefSD (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.908764 on 2012-11-23T21:13:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:13, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 21:23, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 21:27, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for for violating WP:1RR in multiple articles and POV-pushing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. Bbb23 (talk) 21:39, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice to administrators: In a March 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."

Arab-Israeli arbitration notice[edit]

As a result of an arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, broadly understood. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad editing restrictions, described here and below.

Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project.
Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines.
Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently WP:AE), or the Committee.

These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.

Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary.

This notice is only effective if given by an uninvolved administrator and logged here.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:43, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Bbb23 (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dealing with racism in Wikipedia articles[edit]

Hi. I notice you've been blocked for a couple of weeks. This happens when an editor breaches editing rules. If you've noticed content in articles that is clearly unbalanced or prejudicial toward a topic, especially in an area as hotly-contested as Palestine-Israel, the best way forward for a new editor is to:

remove or correct the text
if another editor "reverts" your edit, discuss the issue in a calm (this can be very hard) manner on the article's "talk page", which you can access by clicking the tab at the top of the article
if you're unable to reach agreement on the article talk page, start a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard (by clicking the "new section" tab at the top of that page) where uninvolved editors may be able to add their perspective.

Always remain calm and respectful, even if others are not. There is a bit to learn about making progress on Wikipedia articles, and making progress in highly emotional topics involves a steep learning curve. Read any and all policies that you are pointed to and, remember, remain calm and respectful at all times. Good luck. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 02:38, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I've just noticed this discussion where a number of experienced Wikipedia editors have complained about the racism in the article Palestinian incitement. Apparently it's being blogged about on the CBS website. And another editor has proposed that the article be deleted.

I've asked the admin who blocked you from editing this talk page to allow you to do so again, in case you have any questions. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 06:06, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Block extended[edit]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for violating Wikipedia's policy on sockpuppetry. Using or creating new accounts to avoid violating the three revert rule, to edit war, or avoid a block or ban are considered violations of policies regarding sockpuppets. If you wish to contest a block, do not create new accounts to do so, please e-mail the blocking administrator instead. Your block will expire in one month. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. (ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 16:11, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Block extended (again)[edit]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia for violating Wikipedia's policy on sockpuppetry. Using or creating new accounts to avoid violating the three revert rule, to edit war, or avoid a block or ban are considered violations of policies regarding sockpuppets. If you wish to contest a block, do not create new accounts to do so, please e-mail the blocking administrator instead. (ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 16:15, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]