Jump to content

User talk:Editwriter98

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]
Hello, Editwriter98! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 23:08, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Welcome to Wikipedia! Need a hand?

[edit]
Teahouse logo
Hello! Editwriter98, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SarahStierch (talk) 22:52, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Susan Branch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:34, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Susan Branch

[edit]

Congratulations on the new article! I have removed the entries in the external links list that have already been used as references. The ones that do not legitimately belong in the External links list (See WP:EL and WP:ELNO) but could still be used as sources to expand and improve the article I moved to Talk:Susan Branch#Some sources for expanding the article. I've also done a few minor technical tweaks to the article. Roger (talk) 17:45, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks for the efforts. It's funny I added all those external links because I was told I needed more sourcing! So if I add info from those sources and reference the lines, will that work? And my biggest concern is that I started out with a bigger article and was told to make it less. So I am wondering what kind of info can I include to make it better that will not make it less of an encyclopedia entry? I just do not know what is acceptable to include, but, of course, want to make it as good as I possibly can. Many thanks!

The article currently has nothing about her education, personal life (marriage, does she have children, etc). What do critics and commentators say about her work? Some basic info about her writing would also help - what genre(s) are her books - crime thrillers or cookbooks? Assume that your reader has never heard of her (true in my case). Roger (talk) 21:34, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks - that is exactly what I needed to know. I appreciate it! Editwriter98 (talk) 22:00, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]