Jump to content

User talk:Edmoil

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your edit to Red meat[edit]

Please be extremely careful about adding medical claims to articles. In your recent edit to Red meat, you added a medical claim about red meat, but conveniently failed to mention that the study was done on persons with high cholesterol. You also generalized the results of the study although such generalization cannot be determined from the study alone. Future such edits can be reverted on the grounds of not stating the facts adequately.

Oh and please clean up your user page if you will. --Amit 05:30, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, I kind of liked it. Octane [improve me] 05.07.07 0018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Caitlin Hill[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Caitlin Hill, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TwentiethApril1986 (want to talk?) 19:48, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Caitlin Hill[edit]

I have nominated Caitlin Hill, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caitlin Hill. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TwentiethApril1986 (want to talk?) 06:12, 16 October 2008 (UTC) TwentiethApril1986 (want to talk?) 06:12, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]