User talk:Edward Bower

Hello, Edward Bower, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Thanks for archiving Talk:Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. In the future, to avoid potential misunderstandings, it's a good idea to use an edit summary when archiving a talk page, in addition to posting a comment on that page as you did.

Again, welcome! --Ginkgo100^talk 21:41, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

restoration of text in Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder[edit]

With regards to the re-addition of the large section of text. I am posting my reply here too because sometimes I forget to look back at the talk page for replies...

I think the stuff you re-added detracts from the value, I dont think it's should be here, What do you think the importance of it is?Edward Bower 03:09, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

My primary concern was that I just noticed that it was deleted all of a sudden for a reason I couldn't determine, so I fixed it. In terms of relevancy while a lot of it seems to be very drug specific and kind of nitty gritty, some of it is definitely important and should be kept for sure. ADHD coaching, questions about metabolism in people with and without ADHD, and widely used alternative treatments for example. Personally, I think people should go though the treatment section for relevancy piece by piece rather than mass delete it. Perhaps to cut down on all the drug specific bits, a separate article on treatments for ADHD could be created. Or it could be deleted. I just want to reach a consensus. Sifaka ^talk 03:23, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I forked Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder treatments out of the Treatments section because it was becoming rather listy and unwieldy. If you would like to collaborate or have comments and suggestions I would love to hear them. Sifaka ^talk 00:22, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Editing appreciation[edit]

I know this is a bit random but I really appreciate all the work you have done in the Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder treatments article. Your knowledge base really adds a solid foundation and you really have improved it a ton. So some kudos to you! Sifaka ^talk 00:10, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chlorfenciclan[edit]

Chlorfenciclan couldn't be found anywhere. I added a nonsense tag to the page. This was under my assumption that it was fake, if it is in fact real please remove it or add hangon and accept my appologies —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.103.85.128 (talk) 22:59, 4 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Making stubs[edit]

When you start a new article with only a short blurb, you can mark it as a stub so others know it's not a mistake. I don't know if it's the case for the ones you added, but sometimes drug articles get duplicated under several names. To minimize that, the convention is to use the INN label for the title, like dioxadrol instead of dexoxadrol. KonradG 01:13, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dextroamphetamine[edit]

Have you been following the dispute at Talk:Dextroamphetamine? It's insanely long now and I'd like some outside opinions. Specifically, I'd like to know if you believe that Scuro has been intentionally mis-representing evidence and repeatedly making misleading statements. KonradG 03:08, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Edward Bower/temp[edit]

User:Edward Bower/temp, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Edward Bower/temp and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Edward Bower/temp during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:17, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

D:L-amphetamine ratio of Adderall[edit]

Hello Edward, I've questioned the D:L-amphetamine ratio of Adderall, and saw that you have introduced the statement that I'm questioning. Could you please comment it in the Dextroamphetamine talk? Thanks and best --Richard (talk) 11:02, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Vyvanse70mg.jpg[edit]

The file File:Vyvanse70mg.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

low quality and unused

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:38, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]