User talk:EgyptianAstro

May 2023

Hello, I'm Grachester. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Dendera zodiac seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Grachester (talk) 04:39, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to Dendera zodiac could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:19, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What's wrong with you?

You refuse to check the references of my participation that I indicated in the article on the Zodiac of Dendera but you, you want to keep my images?

No need to threaten to block me, you have already abused your authority by refusing to check the official references that Grachester has not even taken the time to read!

I would say to the judge that after my report about my desire to remove my images, you blocked me, thus refusing to respect my copyrights which I never ceded to you, but just lent.

You can check on the French version of the article in question, they removed my images after verification.

Here is the 2019 version: https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zodiaque_de_Dend%C3%A9rah&oldid=159801556

You pissed me off, because you didn't even take the time to check the official references that show that Wikipedia is absolutely unreliable when it comes to astronomy. You refused official references from NASA, the IAU and the National Library of France!

Bunch of ignoramuses that you are, it's not you who block me, it's me who blocks you! EgyptianAstro (talk) 05:40, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The personal attacks do you no credit at all. You cannot revoke a Creative Commons license once you have granted it, so you have no standing to demand the removal an image given under that license. You will note that I did not dispute your sources, but rather the language you used. Please read WP:NPOV which is one of Wikipedia's core policies. Grachester (talk) 05:44, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I invited you to reformulate my text if in some places it did not seem neutral to you.

Me, what surprises me is that your current article does not respect at all the neutrality that you demand from me.

Indeed, you make Eric Aubourg the greatest astronomer of all time, whereas he hasn't published anything for more than 20 years elsewhere than within the IFAO, which is not comparable to an astronomy magazine.

IFAO articles are not sold in bookstores, but only distributed to IFAO members including Egyptologists.

You mistakenly think that I want to pollute Wikipedia, when it's quite the opposite.

I'm willing to borrow a million dollars to give it to you if you actually read all the links and bibliography you provide in the article.

But I know that's not the case, however, I've read them all and had them checked by astronomers who have all said that Wikipedia is making fun of itself, with Eric Aubourg's theory.

Just use this link (recommander by Nasa if you read the name of Xavier Jubier, below in the Acknowledgments ) https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEsearch/SEsearchmap.php?Ecl=19470520 ) to see that Egypt could not observe the solar ecipse of March 7 BCE because the solar occultation rate was below 40% in Alexandria and less than 20 % in Dendera:

http://xjubier.free.fr/site_pages/solar_eclipses/xSE_GoogleMap3.php?Ecl=-00500307&Acc=2&Umb=1&Lmt=1&Mag=0

Any serious astronomer will tell you that it takes at least 88% for an eclipse to be observed.

But I'm wasting my time trying to introduce you to the basics of astronomy, you make me think of a sect in the pay of the Louvre.

I am not Xavier Jubier, if you believed that. He don't care about Wikipedia, because he is member of IAU : https://www.iau.org/administration/membership/individual/15159/

I juste find him when I searched serious astronomers. EgyptianAstro (talk) 06:11, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 10:33, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]