User talk:Ehausler

Now he is proven guilty....so stop vandalising the page. Contrubute with something instead of just destroying.

Edit warring on Papa Dee[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Papa Dee. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. SWik78 (talk • contribs) 19:09, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008[edit]

The recent edit you made to Papa Dee constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Nsaa (talk) 19:22, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Papa Dee, you will be blocked from editing. Please don't remove well sourced material from this article. Nsaa (talk) 09:16, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Papa Dee. Flewis^(talk) 09:37, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. So Why 12:32, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

As you have agreed via e-mail to stop acting the way that got you blocked and discuss the issues at Talk:Papa Dee. Please note that if you resume unconstructive editing, your block may be re-instated.

Request handled by: So Why 08:53, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the RfC on the Papa Dee article's talk page[edit]

hello Ehausler - i saw your fresh edit to the Papa Dee article, and wanted to point out that there's a RFC going on about the issue on the talk page there, where people have been working hard on reaching a consensus about what that paragraph should say. it would be really constructive if you would join that RfC instead of just editing the paragraph again. i'm going to revert the fresh edit until consensus is reached in the RFC - not out of hostility, but simply because the whole purpose of the RFC is to try to reach a consensus. please join the discussion there. Sssoul (talk) 12:44, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]