User talk:EinsteinEdits

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites that you are affiliated with, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. Hu12 15:48, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

do not edit warnings or remove others commentsHu12 22:49, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to remove content from pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NeoChaosX [talk | contribs] 01:00, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is in reference to you removing the above warnings from your talk page. Removing warnings from your talk page is considered vandalism, and can get you blocked. NeoChaosX [talk | contribs] 01:05, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

stop spamming my page with your nonsense crap you are not god, i am here to help. You make poor choices and modifications to wikipedia based on your opinions not fact, leave me and my edits alone unless thet are spam. I am here to help, more so than you as you seem to be on an ego trip, as for removing stuff, it's my page!!!my about me page and my discussion, --Edited By a Professor of Life 01:06, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What Wikipedia is not policies here apply to your user page as well. Your user page is not a personal homepage, nor is it a blog. More importantly, your user page is not yours. It is a part of Wikipedia, and exists to make collaboration among Wikipedians easier, not for self-promotion. please stop spamming, read External links policy and Spam policy before you continue to add inapropriate links. Removing warnings from your talk page is considered vandalism, If you continue to remove content from pages, you will be blocked.

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Hu12 14:41, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spam

If you mean the links on Nitrous, I removed them because they are to a commercial site, and I didn't see anything important there that isn't, or at least, shouldn't just be in the article already. We also don't usually have "FAQ sections" in articles.--Cúchullain ^t/c 19:49, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I removed that warning someone put on your user page (since you removed it once before I assumed you didn't want it there). It should have gone here, not there, and you were in the right to remove it.--Cúchullain ^t/c 19:51, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you really think they add to the article, go ahead and put them back in. But put them under an "External links" section.--Cúchullain ^t/c 23:19, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. -- SonicAD (talk) 00:54, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue spamming you will be blocked from editing. -- SonicAD (talk) 01:02, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just some things I'd like to clear up

A few points I'd like to bring to your attention, sir.

Edits like this to another user's page are not conducive to improving Wikipedia. Also in regards to this edit:

There are no "High Admins" to ask. Wikipedia is community-driven, meaning that all editors start with equal standing, gaining respect from other editors solely from the quality and amount of work they do for the community.
I know this is going to be hard to accept, but the admins on Wikipedia do not "run" the site. We perform maintainance tasks, more like a janitor than a club of powerful individuals. Admins are no more "powerful" than other editors, we're simply given tools that the community trusts us to use with the consensus of said community in mind.
As admins are not the leaders of the community, as its servants we do not have the authority to declare that any specific type of external link is or is not acceptable. You may wish to read your conversation on User_talk:Cuchullain#Spam over again, I just did. There is a Bold-Revert-Discuss cycle on Wikipedia among others. You be bold and add something, then someone else reverts the change, then you both stop and discuss things to determine if the change is good for the project as a whole. If you disagree, you find a third opinion and see if it helps, If not, you file a request for comments, or otherwise involve yourselves in dispute resolution to try to determine with more deliberate outside assistance if the changes you propose are helpful.
Please, both of you (Both you, EinsteinEdits, and SonicAD) please try to be more calm when editing Wikipedia. Assume Good Faith about the other editor. Re-read what you've typed. If the message were sent to you, would it make you upset? If so, scrap the message and find another way of explaining your side. Remember there's always a possibility that you're incorrect in your assumptions. Good advice for other things, too. Feel free to pass it on. :)

Einstein, it'd be in your best interests to try to help SonicAD keep whoever it is posting his personal information off his page, and I'm sure he'll try to protect your page the same way. The problem is, a checkuser request shows that the person that was maliciously posting his personal information on his user and talkpage just happens to be in your IP range. Now, I'm assuming good faith and am sure that you're not the person doing this, but the problem is, if we end up having to block that IP range to protect our Wikipedia...well, you wouldn't be able to edit either! So, please, keep an eye on eachothers pages. It'd be a great thing if all Wikipedians could protect eachother like that!
Brad Patrick is the Wikipedia Foundation's legal counsel, and as such is a very busy man. Handling harassment on-wiki is something that the community does, not Mr. Patrick. Please, let him continue to assist in making complex decisions regarding international copyright law and having us allowed in China, rather than issues like this. It doesn't help.
Oh, if you're having a dispute with someone, it's best to try to avoid using test templates and warnings on eachother. Please, just try to talk to eachother calmly and with common courtesy. Remember that the person you're having a dispute with is just as much a member of our community as you are.
Thanks, and I hope you continue to be a productive and valued member of Wikipedia! ~Kylu (u|t) 03:23, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nitrous

You have been warned enough. [1]

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. Hu12 00:36, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More strange anonymous harassment

Mr. EinsteinEdits, Oddly enough, after Hu12 issued a warning, an AOL IP (from the same block as you, again) reverted his warning off your page. It also went though and reverted a bunch of his other edits. Now, last time I gave you a very nice explanation and ... quite honestly, I was trying to give you a subtle hint that just maybe you should knock off harassing people using AOL IP addresses. There are certain individuals on Wikipedia called CheckUsers (see Help:CheckUser) who can determine the IP that you edit from even while logged in, and there are a number of disconcerting matches between your edits and the harassment edits. This isn't the first time we've had to deal with this, you know, and I fully expect it to not happen again. Furthermore, I'm asking you to also find a different way to contribute to Wikipedia than by adding external links to articles, they're clearly divisive and are not appreciated by the community. The next admin to come across such links will surely start initiating blocks. Also:

Incase you are unaware you do not own wikipedia, nor are you an admin. It is not up to your judgement to threaten, or abuse wikipedia terms. Links can be discussed and weighed by admins and you do NOT have the sole ability to regulate any link on wikipedia.[2].

Admins are here to clean up problems, primarily. Your warning to Hu12 was out of line and inappropriate. I'll ask that you read and comprehend Civility Policy before editing again. I'm afraid my patience in this matter is straining. ~Kylu (u|t) 04:11, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked this account indefinetely. Maybe if you can cut this out, then it can perhaps be unblocked.Voice-of-All 05:10, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]