User talk:Ejaz-Booni

Welcome![edit]

Hi Ejaz-Booni! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Wikishovel (talk) 11:39, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I am really sorry for not providing verifiable references at the first stage, in fact I did not understand it how to do it on this platform at first, then I found the guidelines and have resubmitted the article after putting references. What I want to do, at the time, is keep working on this article once its published. I hope I will be guided to get this article published, then I will keep working on this as I have learned how to include reference. Ejaz-Booni (talk) 09:20, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond to the paid editing concerns described below. 331dot (talk) 09:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Karma in Hinduism. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments belong on the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and may respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 09:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ejaz-Booni (talk) 09:46, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ejaz-Booni. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Forum for Language Initiatives, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ejaz-Booni. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ejaz-Booni|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:57, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Ejaz-Booni, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ejaz-Booni|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 13:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Draft:Forum for Language Initiatives has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:33, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Forum for Language Initiatives (May 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikishovel was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Forum for Language Initiatives and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wikishovel (talk) 11:39, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ejaz-Booni! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Wikishovel (talk) 11:39, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Forum for Language Initiatives (May 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Forum for Language Initiatives and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:58, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ask yourself, "does this even look like an article?" Please check your work. Paid editors are expected to know what to do. Do not resubmit without learning what to do 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:59, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Previously, I could not place references but I was helped by a video to learn how to do that. Now, since I am the employee of the organization, I want to write article about on this platform, please help me understand the process of disclosing my relationship with the organization. At the end, a question, is it not allowed for an employee to write an article for his organization? Ejaz-Booni (talk) 10:58, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]