Jump to content

User talk:Ekidnagrrl17

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello Ekidnagrrl17! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 03:38, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Queer ideas for articles

[edit]

I am sorry but we simply do not want articles about individual university courses, especially when they are merely copy-and-pastes of the university website. And your sock-puppetry on the talk pages fools no-one. -- RHaworth 03:41, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We already have a Queer studies article. -- RHaworth 03:48, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • hello, yes I did copy and paste. But people are not familiar with our major so this makes it more accessible for them to find it. If you give me time it will grow to something more. I am also using that page as a way to get info out for out class 170 for which we are trying to create a fluid definition of "queer" though wikipedia And my comment was because I was excited, so please excuse me if you have interpreted it as falseness Ekidnagrrl17 03:57, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to be blunt but nobody outside UC Davis is greatly interested in what courses it offers. May I suggest again that your excitement should flow into existing articles such as queer. -- RHaworth 04:01, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Well may I be blunt, but because you don't care about something is that a reason to delete it? I am serious, you should really consider if the censorship of wikipedia should be based on what you do and don't want to read. I will tell you know that this is not my last attempt to add this page. And I am not interested in adding to the current "queer" page because it is already such a mess. And if you have any comments on how this page can be less distasteful to you I would love to hear them, but if you do not want to see what our class has to say I suggest that you simply not look at our page. Ekidnagrrl17 04:22, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One man's "censorship" is another man's "consensus editorial policy". We already have four established Wikipedians who do not want to read WMS 170 Queer Studies. I am so confident of the consensus that I shall protect the title if it gets reposted. You may raise the matter at deletion review if you wish but don't expect much sympaty. -- RHaworth 04:53, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]