User talk:Elezzi.A

This is Elezzi.A's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gregory Marchildon (January 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Star Mississippi was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please read WP:REFB and WP:ELNO for how to properly cite Marchildon's work for it to be evaluated for academic notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gregory Marchildon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Star Mississippi 20:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Elezzi.A! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Star Mississippi 20:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Elezzi.A, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Best practices for editors with close associations
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
The Teahouse, our help forum for new editors

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Star Mississippi 20:50, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback, Star Mississippi. I want to clarify that I have no conflict of interest concerning the subject of the article. I have read three of his books due to my academic interest in health policy development in Canada. It's important to note that I am not affiliated with any company or entity; my username is simply my last name. Furthermore, my engagement in creating this content originated from curiosity, driven by the absence of information about this academic and public figure on Wikipedia. In an attempt to provide comprehensive details, I aimed to emulate the writing style found on Jordan Peterson's Wikipedia page. If there are specific aspects that need modification, please advise. I dedicated over a month to researching this author, and I documented the information I uncovered during this process. Elezzi.A (talk) 21:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to hear that. Please read WP:REFB and WP:ELNO for how to properly source information. Anything that isn't sourced will need ti be removed so comprehensive details should not be the goal. Star Mississippi 21:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the guidance I am working on some changes and I will resubmit for review as soon as I'm done. Elezzi.A (talk) 20:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gregory Marchildon (January 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

The body of the article should have no external links, see WP:EXTERNAL. If they should be in-line citations, please convert them by following the tutorial at WP:INTREFVE.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gregory Marchildon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 13:28, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Qcne, thank you for the guidance I have removed all the external links as per the WP:EXTERNAL guide. I will resubmit it shortly. Regards Elezzi.A (talk) 20:17, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Gregory Marchildon has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gregory Marchildon. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:39, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gregory Marchildon (March 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gregory Marchildon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:40, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dont give up[edit]

I'm sorry you were spoken to so rudely; some people seem to forget that they were new to Wikipedia once.

Please don't be put off. If you want to keep editing, you're welcome to ask me questions, with in here in this section of your talk page, or on my talk page. or you can email me (link in the menu on my user page), but that would mean I can see your email address. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:07, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for the blunt comment, if your draft was edited for neutral tone I would be happy to accept it. Theroadislong (talk) 20:17, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I'm good. I'll give it another read-through. Maybe I was just really impressed with his work, which is why I used those words. This wasn't a serious task for me; I was just exploring and having fun instead of scrolling through my social media feed. Cheers! Elezzi.A (talk) 20:29, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Andy for the support truly appreciated. Elezzi.A (talk) 20:20, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]