User talk:Elisunshine01

Outstanding Research![edit]

	Fantastic Research Work
	Thanks for the great research on Pink Moon. The details around "Plaisir d'amour" are fascinating!

		The WikiProject Albums Barnstar
		For your great work on Pink Moon Pugsly8000 (talk) 21:46, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pink Moon Peer Review[edit]

Hey Liz...we got a review, check out my talk page for more detail. The reviewer doesn't like some of our citations in the references section. Our luck, we didn't edit that piece. He recommends taking out the Sputnikmusic review because it is not from an editor. Good advice I think, I'm going to start with that. Pugsly8000 (talk) 22:46, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Turns out the reviewer is Sputnikmusic IS an emeritus so this should stay. I asked the reviewer for clarification. Next, that reviewer went through all the citations and fixed the format already. I thanked him for that and we should be consistent and good with our citations. Remember how you said we should fix our web citations? We did that, but we missed the book citations and he corrected them. Glad he did this before it got reviewed. We got more reviews from another Wikipedian, he felt this was ready for GA. Pugsly8000 (talk) 23:05, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The reviewer feels we should split "Reception and Legacy" into "Reception" and "Legacy". I remember that coming up briefly, but we opted not to. I think this could easily be split into two. There is a clear break and the ad for the release with the "Reception" section and the reviews in the "Legacy" section. He also says the release information is usually in a table. I didn't see this on other album pages, even GAs. However, it is recommended in the WikiProject Albums Style Guide. Pugsly8000 (talk) 23:18, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

VW Promotion[edit]

Hey Elisunshine01...check out User_talk:Richard3120, I have a question for you and Richard3120 there. Pugsly8000 (talk) 21:25, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]