User talk:Elizabethg507

Speedy deletion nomination of Mark White Jr[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mark White Jr requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JamesG5 (talk) 07:47, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bushwick (film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. JamesG5 (talk) 07:54, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This also applies to you adding Markdabeast/Mark White to List of people from Sacramento, California & Jackson Gosnell to The Outcasts (2017 film). JamesG5 (talk) 07:56, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Elizabethg507. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Draft_talk:Mark_White_Jr, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Elizabethg507. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Elizabethg507|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. So Why 08:31, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabethg507, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by Issuewire on behalf of Markdabeast1 for their contributions to Wikipedia.

Elizabethg507 (talk) 08:41, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Markdabeast1, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

_pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 11:01, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jackson Gosnell[edit]

Please note that the above conversation RE paid editing applies to ANY work you do on Wikipedia that you're being paid for. I note that you also added a credit for Jackson Gosnell, another nmon-notable "social media personality" with only a dubious bit part credit, to The Outcasts (2017 film). That was removed & then replaced by an unregistered account matching an IP that's done edits on other pages you're involved with. If you're also working for him either directly or on behalf of a PR group you must disclose it & should refrain from direct edits. JamesG5 (talk) 13:54, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]