User talk:Elric Bellamy

Welcome!

Hello, Elric Bellamy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

To keep up to date with interesting news and developments, you may also wish to subscribe to The Signpost, our illustrated monthly newspaper, and have it delivered directly to your talk page.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 03:43, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Hello, I'm C.Fred. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Paul Nehlen, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 03:44, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1) Newsweek is considered a highly reliable source.

2) "Libelous" is a word with legal meaning. We do not permit legal threats or implications of legally actionable situations in Wikipedia talk pages, etc. --Orange Mike | Talk 04:55, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't care less if Newsweek is considered reliable by those who enjoy it's inherently leftist bias, and it's false information which it publishes. I've made no threats, and I understand that Libelous is a word with legal meaning, bud. I'm not going to ignore libelous statements because of some rats. Hopefully you can get a grip on reality some day. Elric Bellamy (talk) 18:33, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletions from your own talk page are permitted

It is our rule to allow an editor to remove content from their own talk page, since it is presumed that the deleting editor read the content before deleting it. I'm not sure I really like the custom, but it is our rule. If you disagree with an editor's edits to a particular article, it might be a good idea to take the discussion to the article's talk page, rather than the editor's, as some editors are more comfortable with that method of discussion. --Orange Mike | Talk 04:51, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]