User talk:Elvorix

	Welcome to my talk page! If you want to send a message on any topic, click "New section". Don't forget to sign with four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your messages. Messages are archived each month.

Herberts Bērtulsons[edit]

If you give a hint that he was German national. And killed in action or something like that... Now it looks like he was Latvian and killed in a prison or so. --129.187.244.19 (talk) 10:09, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. ×Elvorix^talk 10:12, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Advice for reverting vandalism[edit]

When reverting vandalism, try warning the vandal or reporting to AIV (so they can get blocked for it)

Also, consider using tools like twinkle and RedWarn, which make reverting vandalism a lot easier.

- AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 15:24, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was using twinkle, huggle and other tools while on the computer. But SWViewer is the easiest as I will be making changes from mobile for a while. Thanks. ×Elvorix^talk 07:29, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Al-A'raf Problem that you just removed![edit]

Assalamu Alaikum, Thanks for informing me, Through your knowledge! I changed it because, this pictures were not matched by this context of the Quran Ayats, And also add "ﷺ" after the name of the prophet because Allah says in the Quran, Oh Prophet, those who here your name but can't say "sallallahu alaihi wasallam" means "Peace Be Upon Him"; they are very rude. Islamic Scholar Encyclopedia (talk) 11:58, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Islamic Scholar Encyclopedia:, I also think the pictures are rude. But this is the free encyclopedia, not the Islamic encyclopedia. You can revert the change, since I don't know enough about the subject, I'll leave it to other editors. Thanks. ×Elvorix^talk 19:55, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted[edit]

Hi Elvorix,

After reviewing your request, I have added your account to the rollback group. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Users should be informed (or warned) after their edits have been reverted. If warnings repeatedly don't help, WP:ANI is the default place to go. In cases of very clear ongoing intentional damage to the encyclopedia, WP:AIV can be used.
Reverting someone's edits may confuse or upset them. Whenever other users message you on your talk page, please take the time to respond to their concerns; accountability is important. For most users who message you, the tone and quality of your message will permanently influence their opinion about Wikipedia in general.
Because the plain default rollback link does not provide any explanatory edit summary, it must not be used to revert good faith contributions, even if these contributions are disruptive. Take the time to write a proper summary whenever you're dealing with a lack of neutrality or verifiability; a short explanation like "[[WP:NPOV|not neutral]]" or "[[WP:INTREF|Please provide a citation]]" is helpful.
Rollback may never be used to edit war in a genuine content dispute. If you see others edit warring, please file a report at WP:ANEW.
If you encounter private information or threats of physical harm during your patrols, please quickly use Special:EmailUser/Oversight or Special:EmailUser/Emergency; ideally bookmark these pages now. See WP:EMERGENCY and WP:OS for details. If you're regularly patrolling recent changes, you will need both contacts sooner or later, and you'll be happy about the bookmarks.
Use common sense. If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.

To try rollback for the first time, you may like to make an edit to WP:Sandbox, and another one, and another one, and then revert the row with one click. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about rollback. Thank you for your time and work in cleaning up Wikipedia. Happy editing!

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:41, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: TurkHackTeam (April 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mako001 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The use of "Cyber security" here is a massive euphemism. Use something more accurate and descriptive. In addition, if they hacked the Vatican (a sovereign country), UNESCO (an international humanitarian organisation), and the Armenian government (Turkey and Armenia have turbulent history) wouldn't that make them cyber terrorists and/or cyber criminals?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TurkHackTeam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:TurkHackTeam, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 08:14, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Elvorix! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 08:14, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed[edit]

Hello Elvorix! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:16, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]