User talk:Elzo 90

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Hello there,

Welcome to Wikipedia! If you are interested in Dungeons & Dragons materials, the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject has all sorts of resources you might find useful. :) BOZ (talk) 23:11, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Elzo 90. You have new messages at Malcolmxl5's talk page.
Message added 19:30, 22 June 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Elzo 90. You have new messages at Malcolmxl5's talk page.
Message added 22:34, 22 June 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

May 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lennart Bernadotte may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ] ([[head of state]] at the time) into the Nobility of Luxembourg and conferred the title ''[[Count of Wisborg''.<ref>''[[Mémorial]] du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg No 48'', Government of

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:25, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of well-referenced facts[edit]

Please never remove well-referenced facts from any articles on English Wikipedia! Such editing borders on vandalism and will be dealt with as such if it continues. If you would like to make considerable changes to article content, please initiate a discussion on the article's talk page first to see if consensus will support those ideas of yours. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 11:21, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As you very well know, the edits where made after our lenghty discussion on Swedish Wikipedia concerning the title issue. I though we had agreed to separate between facts and speculations, but I see that I was mistaken. I will elaborate the reasons for the edits on the talk pages. Regards /Elzo 90 (talk) 13:28, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please never remove well-referenced facts from any articles on English Wikipedia! That's why I wrote you. No need to reply to anything else. And I think you'll find that the vast majority of users here don't give a hoot about what's been going on at Swedish Wikipedia. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 22:34, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
And I do not expect them to, but I expect you to know better than to throw around the word "vandalism" since we have exchanged views on the subject. I am thankful that you corrected some of the errors in the articles yourself, and I look forward to discussing further changes with you. Also, you might want to consider that you remarked on my removals only minutes after you yourself removed the facts and the source i added to the Prince Bernadotte article. /Elzo 90 (talk) 12:08, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Complaint of edit warring at Prince Bernadotte[edit]

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#Four (so far) users from Swedish Wikipedia reported by User:SergeWoodzing (Result: ). You may respond there if you wish. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 03:30, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will. /Elzo 90 (talk) 10:18, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Careful with sources[edit]

Please be careful when editing article text, such as in Carl Johan Bernadotte, so that sources are not corrupted and reliably sourced and relevant info is not removed. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 00:22, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Avandra for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Avandra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avandra until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 23:47, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ioun for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ioun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ioun until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 20:00, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Erathis for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Erathis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erathis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:34, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Drott (yacht) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Drott (yacht), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MB 02:27, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Drott (yacht)[edit]

Information icon Hello, Elzo 90. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Drott (yacht), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]