User talk:Emeksefer

Welcome!

Hello, Emeksefer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 03:07, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Emeksefer, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Emeksefer! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ottoman Land code[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Ottoman Land code indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:37, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It ok to delete. Someone added it to an article I wrote. It didnt exist yet so I made the category but then I found a better alternative. For now I dont need it. Emeksefer (talk) 12:04, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your changes to Discovery doctrine article[edit]

Hello there

I have reverted your changes to the lead because they were not a concise and accurate summary of the article and were not written from a neutral point of view. As the article states, the doctrine of discovery is not a principle of international law, it is a part of US municipal law based on a contested interpretation of the history of colonization. Aso the lead is meant to be a concise summary of the main points of the article, not a word for word repetition of some parts of the article you wish to highlight. It is sufficient to note that in recent years Indigenous rights activists and some American religious groups have advocated against the doctrine. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 00:19, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]