User talk:Emile123
Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs changing, please feel free to make whatever changes you feel are needed. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit any article by simply following the Edit this page link. You don't even need to log in! (Although there are some reasons why you might like to...) The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use out the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome.--Cyberjunkie | Talk 08:46, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
- A ce propos, j'ai vu que tu as enlevé des liens vers certains éditoriaux et des blogs. Je ne dirais pas que ces liens sont particulièrement enrichissants pour se forger une vision du monde, mais avoir une idée de ce que racontent les fafs ou les idéologues néo-conservateurs peut avoir son intérêt aussi, si c'est clairement marqué comme tel (j'avais étiqueté ces liens "extrème-gauche" ou "extrème-droite" -- pour Dieu sait quelle raison, je n'ai pas vu d'articles de l'extrème-centre, ou meme de genre juste normaux... c'est un peu la course aux armements pour trouver l'édito le plus délirant). Enfin, juste une idée. Rama 09:01, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
Salut. Oui, c'est une idée. Ceci dit, il ne faudrait pas que le nombre de ces liens soit disproportionné par rapport à la représentativité de ces opinions...Emile123 10:17, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
- Oui, je ne suis pas en reste pour me plaindre de ce que des courants de pensée ultra-minoritaires sont surreprésentés du fait que les vociférations sont plus amusantes à regarder que les propos mesurés. C'est ce qui a conduit le syndicat Action_Police_CFTC à avoir un article à lui pour nuancer le propos, ce que je considèrerais en temps normal comme un sujet mineur et sans intérêt, et qui est objectivement injuste en comparaison de syndicats plus importants qui n'ont pas d'article. Rama 12:31, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
Welcome[edit]
Welcome!
Hello, Emile123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Rama 08:56, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia is international it is not France[edit]
In Farnce it is not PC to say where a person come's from or his religion. The bias in France against mulism is clear but subtale. In Wikipedia there is nothing to be ashmed off about person's religion or origin. Facts are facts and they will be on relevant articles. Removal of properly sourced material is vandalism. Add what ever info you want: If you have a source saying the riots are done by Budhists from skadinavian countries please fell free to add it. Zeq 08:10, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
Stop removing material[edit]
Emile, you need to stop removing material from the French riots article without discussion. You have repeatedly tried to delete the same sentences over and over. You need to go to the talk page and discuss why you think these sentences should be removed. Sdedeo 08:26, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, while you think a consensus has been reached on these sentences, others disagree, and there is unfortunately nothing you can do but go back and discuss with the others involved (Zeq, Rama, others) what is going on. The more both sides keep reverting, the more anger builds up. Sdedeo 10:51, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
- Hi Sdedeo, this article has been repeatedly targeted by right-wing anti-islamic extremists. This is a common phenomenon on french political web sites. Discussion is generally not very fruitful.Emile123 18:09, 14 November 2005 (UTC)