User talk:Emilyngu3/Mighty-O Donuts

Peer Review From Anjali

Hi! Great start! Here is the link to your peer review: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Emilyngu3/Mighty-O_Donuts/Anjsan01_Peer_Review Anjsan01 (talk) 23:00, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I peer reviewed your article! Fuller2019 (talk) 03:06, 27 January 2022 (UTC).

Preliminary Review from Kaylea

Hi, I'm starting to walk through articles and give everyone informal early feedback on how they're doing. You'll notice this is a little bit form-letter-ish but I hope it is still helpful!

I see you've made some changes and are starting to incorporate elements from our training, but there's still a ways to go with this article. If you're feeling stuck, please let me know how I can support you.

To help you stay on track, you should look at an existing article on a similar topic to see what sections are included and some additional sources you could pull from.

Kaylea Champion (talk) 07:44, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Peer Review

Hi I have peer reviewed your article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Emilyngu3/Mighty-O_Donuts/Carlematsu_Peer_Review?venotify=created Here is a link to it! Carlematsu (talk) 07:55, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I peer-reviewed your article. Here is the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Emilyngu3/Mighty-O_Donuts/Kfoltz2_Peer_Review?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_peer_review Kfoltz2 (talk) 05:35, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

feedback on progress

Hi @Emilyngu3:

You're definitely making progress on this article, but I think it will need revision in terms of tone, in particular the lead; unfortunately right now it sounds a bit too promotional -- just being blunt right now because I know everyone is trying to finish.

This part in particular seems promotional: "Their values encompass being truthful, innovative, respectful of individuals, communities, and cultures, and respecting nature and the environment."

This bit might be taken as a little too trivial: "Mighty-O uses only sustainable, recyclable or compostable packaging for its items."

And this bit is a little too vague I think: "The company has been recognized by many publications for various achievements.".

You might also see that the main article has recently had its notability questioned -- to the extent that it's notable, these are the criteria: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies) -- details that would help to resolve the question of notability would be particularly welcomed I think.

Awards and honors are often included in a page like this; if there are more, definitely add them.

Some of the new content lacks citations -- I think you have the sources, but need to add the cites?

Good luck and keep going!

Kaylea Champion (talk) 02:00, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Go Live Approval

Hi @Emilyngu3:

You are approved to go live with this article.

As a reminder, here are our go-live steps:

1. Final read-through draft.
2. Check live article for changes. [History Tab]
3. Two browsers side by side, if you can. Source editing mode ("Code mode"), not visual editor.
4. Paragraph by paragraph copy, leaving behind an explanatory edit summary after each chunk of changes.
5. Note on article talk page.
6. Note at the top of your sandbox version.
7. Submit a link to your article on Canvas.
8. Celebrate!

Kaylea Champion (talk) 06:02, 13 February 2022 (UTC)