User talk:Emperor of Earth

United States Senate elections, 1804, let me know if i can help, and add to the template[edit]

Election might be a bit of a misnomer since direct election to the senate didn't occur until 1914. I realize that technically the title's correct, and it probably should stay as is, but maybe you'll consider putting in a note about the 17th amendment's change to the process, or some similar recognition.

In a related vein, I think this vein of articles is valuable, but perhaps we could add more to the core article template, that might help the stub building process. Let me know if I can help. Shadowjams (talk) 08:55, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Great work!!! It is an election, albeit by legislatures, not by the people. Keep it up! —Markles 13:11, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Consistency with rows[edit]

Let's try something, since you're making new articles (THANK YOU, btw). Let's be consistent about how many seats are in each of the Senate Composition charts. I'd like to try 20 seats per row. Plus, let's put the smallest (third) parties in the middle between Dems & republicans. See what I've just done at United States Senate elections, 1858. —Markles 02:57, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Emperor of Earth (talk) 05:22, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In some articles, you've decided NOT to go with 20 per row?—Markles 12:53, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well for the early senate elections which have a lot fewer senators, I think just two rows, adjusted for the number of senators, will suffice, while using the 20-seat rows for the elections with 40+ senators.—Emperor of Earth (talk) 02:53, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK.—Markles 13:00, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome[edit]

I've noticed a few more of your additions since my comment above, and all I can say is that these are great additions to the encyclopedia, and thank you for your hard work. This is exactly the kind of solid article creation the project needs. I wish there were more dedicated mass-edit editors that made real contributions like this. Let me know if I can help. Shadowjams (talk) 10:22, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocks of 10[edit]

How do you like separating blocks of 10? Check out the change I just made to United States Senate elections, 1904.—Markles 13:32, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... Well, I just think it's a little overly complex to have two seperate blocks for the Senate compositions, which causes there to be four different blocks for each before-and-after composition. I think it would be simpler just to continue having one block for the "before" and one block for the "after".—Emperor of Earth (talk) 03:01, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- OK. How about now? I've simplified it considerably. It's easier to read and to edit. Readers can compare blocks of 10 a lot easier than blocks of 20.—Markles 12:23, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- - It's better than before, but... I still think just having blocks of twenty for most senate compositions is best. The blocks of 10 may be simpler to read, but they consume a lot more space on the page. And as to editing the 10-block easier, well it's an election — its pretty much done after it's first put up. And as to other senate compositions, like the post-17th Amendment ones, I think the 24-block and 25-block ones should remain. They look fine.—Emperor of Earth (talk) 19:47, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- - - That's fine. I've reverted.—Markles 20:02, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Templates missing[edit]

Hi, in your articles about "'United States Senate elections" you have used two templates that doesn't exist:

Template:Anti-Jackson Party (United States)/meta/color
Template:Jackson Party (United States)/meta/color

Affected are the articles:

Please have a look at this. The errors have been listed here by this WikiProject.

--Ben Ben (talk) 13:00, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Temporarily commented the tables out.--Ben Ben (talk) 13:38, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problem has been solved by Markles. You can read the details there. Sorry for the inconvenience --Ben Ben (talk) 18:46, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, United States declaration of war upon Mexico[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, United States declaration of war upon Mexico. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Mexican-American War. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Mexican-American War - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. TheLongTone (talk) 07:46, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]