User talk:Enaku

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Enaku, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- JLaTondre 23:44, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page Blanking[edit]

On 31-May, you blanked There there. Blanking pages is generally considered a bad idea. Blanking is also not the same as deleting. I've reverted it to the previous version. If you believe the redirect should be deleted, please follow the redirect portion of the deletion procedures. If you have questions, please let me know. Thanks! -- JLaTondre 23:44, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NIN WikiProject[edit]

I'd like to invite you to join the newly-formed Nine Inch Nails WikiProject. There's alot of NIN-related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help us get this project off the ground and a few Nine Inch Nails pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks! Drewcifer (talk) 04:02, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: The Samuel Jackson Five[edit]

Hi :) I can restore the article if you wish, but I see it was deleted once before that. If you could point me to a reliable source asserting the notability of the band (eg: not MySpace) that would be great. I'd prefer if the article did not get deleted again when someone else comes around. Cheers! -- Luk talk 09:06, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, while last.fm is a good indicator to point that the band might be notable, only significant mentions in the press is considered a reliable source. -- Luk talk 11:30, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]