User talk:EncephalonSeven

Welcome[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy being a Wikipedian, and I wish you well with your edits. Wikipedia is a fun place, and there is always something new to do. Here are some helpful links for you...

The five pillars of Wikipedia -- What Wikipedia is, what we do, and what we adhere by
How to edit -- Editing isn't hard at all, but this guide will tell you how to do it properly.
Help pages -- Having difficulty with something? Need to know how to do something neat, like tables? Go here.
Tutorial -- Need a step by step guide?
How to write a great article -- This will tell you all about quality.
Manual of Style

When you edit talk pages, don't forget to sign your name by adding four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your message. This will automatically add your username and the time of your signing.

If you have any questions, you may contact me, Linuxbeak, at my talk page. Again, welcome to Wikipedia! Linuxbeak | Talk 02:53, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Images[edit]

Please do not upload images unless you can verify they are not copyrighted or unless you can make a case for fair use. Please elaborate on the license of the brain images. --tomf688^{talk} 21:52, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding. Unfortunately, I believe educational-use-only images such as these are not permissible on Wikipedia, since they are not compatible with the GFDL. Please read more on image copyright tags so you know what can or can't be used. Thanks. --tomf688^{talk} 00:54, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please check out Wikipedia:Copyright FAQ; educational-use-only images are prohibited. However, if you can make a case in favor of fair use, then they might be useable. --tomf688^{talk} 01:11, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you don't have to add a new subheading for every reply on this issue. Simply add beneath the previous comment whatever your reply is, with a : in front of it so it will be indented. --tomf688^{talk} 01:13, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this part of the page I directed you to above. There really isn't much leeway on this issue, as the person who said there cannot be any images of this type is Jimmy Wales, the guy who owns Wikipedia. What he says, goes, basically. --tomf688^{talk} 01:36, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well you can take it in whatever direction you want to. You might want to try to ask for some help from people a bit more versed on the subject in the image copyright tags article. --tomf688^{talk} 01:59, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Movement[edit]

What does this one think of the movement? --Kin Khan 02:02, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Leninism[edit]

You have suffered some harsh treatment. I hope we can keep the discussion going forward. There is some progress on these pages, and the conflict is improving it. It would be a step back, literally, if we followed S's tactics of reversions. --DuncanBCS 17:40, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the encouragement. I understand that some of my revisions may be perceived as non-enyclopedia style, but at least they deserve some discussion. --EncephalonSeven 20:48, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

EncephalonSeven graph[edit]

Woah... maths, i didn't liked them, anyways that graph looks cool, what is it?.HappyApple 01:56, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That's a collection of plots x=sin(t); y=cos(n*t), where n=1,2,3, ... The so-called lissajous figures. --EncephalonSeven 02:03, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Putin[edit]

Your addition of a gay porn image to the Putin article was not a notable improvement...

Oops -- the picture can indeed be interpreted this way. I've deleted it.--EncephalonSeven 05:42, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm...how else could a threesome of naked elderly men, one of whom is clearly being fellated by another, be "interpreted"?

"Political chierarchy"? ... Anyway, this picture is history now. --EncephalonSeven 20:42, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Russia portal[edit]

Thanks! Are you aware of the Russia portal here at en-wiki. Feel free to add some items from the portal's "things you can do" to your TODO list. The most important for now are the announcement boards: one for new articles and the other for all other questions. You may want to add them to your watchlist. Cheers, --Irpen 00:01, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

I would like to express my thanks to all the good people who spent their valuable time time and effort working on my (failed) RfA voting. Especially for those who actually voted to support me :). Lets move on and make together our Wikipedia an even greater place abakharev 10:02, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please vote[edit]

Hi. You voted in support of Alex Bakharev his previous RfA, and I just wanted to let you know that there's a second one at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Alex Bakharev 2. --Khoikhoi 03:11, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your voting![edit]

Hi, thanks for your voting on my RFA. It has finished with the result 88/14/9, and I am promoted. I am really overwhelmed with the amount of support I have got. With some of you we have edited many articles as a team, with some I had bitter arguments in the past, some of you I consider to be living legends of Wikipedia and some nicks I in my ignorance never heard before. I love you all and I am really grateful to you.

If you feel I can help you or Wikipedia as a human, as an editor or with my newly acquired cleaning tools, then just ask and I will be happy to assist. If you will feel that I do not live up to your expectation and renegade on my promises, please contact me. Maybe it was not a malice but just ignorance or a short temper. Thank you very much, once more! abakharev 07:34, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Russian stereotypes[edit]

AfD nomination of Russian stereotypes[edit]

An editor has nominated Russian stereotypes, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russian stereotypes and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 15:38, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

brains.jpg[edit]

i've removed your image Image:Brains.jpg from Cetacean intelligence because the elephant brain seems too small, and i'm worried it's wildly inaccurate. Please correct me if i'm wrong. I've left comments on the Cetacean intelligence talk page too. Thanks. —Pengo 04:56, 6 March 2007 (UTC) actually it's fine. —Pengo 14:36, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]