Jump to content

User talk:Endor chicken

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. One or more of the external links you added in this edit to After Man: A Zoology of the Future do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. You may wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CL — 23:54, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009[edit]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to List of Who Framed Roger Rabbit characters. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 16:34, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You need to stop adding material based on poor or questionable sources into the article. The Internet Movie Script Database is not a reliable source, as there's no oversight or certification over the scripts presented there- they are user uploaded, and therefore not citable. The figurerealm.com listing you keep using does not claim what you say it does - there is a picture of a vulture on the cardback, but nowhere does it say that it is the vulture you claim it to be. That is original research, and therefore uncitable. Your useage of DVD special features is also problematic, as these are not easily checked, and not all versions of the film have the same features. You need to come up with MUCh more reliable sources. Continue to add material with similar porr sourcing, and I will have no recourse but to report you, and possibly have you blocked. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 19:29, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Who Framed Roger Rabbit characters, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 20:35, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User talk:TheRealFennShysa. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 20:37, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]