User talk:EnglandEnigma

March 2010

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Roderic Noble. Thank you. I'd also like to direct you to WP:SOCK, specifically, the prohibition against using multiple accounts to edit the same page. I'm assuming good faith, I suspect you didn't know the rules, but you should not edit the same page as multiple editors, and all alternate accounts should be clearly identified on their respective user pages. —ShadowRanger ^(talk|stalk) 17:09, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because this seems to be the currently active account, I'll post this notice here, in addition to the informal response to your thread on my talk page: Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Weird, possibly programmatic set of socks editing Roderic Noble. Thank you. —ShadowRanger ^(talk|stalk) 17:56, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

While we're at it, are you by any chance the operator of the other accounts that have frequented the Roderic page? If so, why did you abandon them? Thanks. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 17:59, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A "personal interview" by you does not constitute the sort of reliable source required to furnish details in a biographical article on Wikipedia, per Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons, so I have stubbed the article back to a basic version. Please do not re-add the information you say you obtained from an interview. IMDB is also not an acceptable source for biographical details of a person who has not had article published about him. You are welcome to discuss this at the thread Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Weird, possibly programmatic set of socks editing Roderic Noble. Thanks. Edison (talk) 20:12, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]