User talk:EnglishDude98

This is EnglishDude98's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Iban Fagoaga Aguirre has been accepted

Iban Fagoaga Aguirre, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Israell (talk) 12:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ignacio Jesús Trujillo Cabrera (April 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Chus Trujillo instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ignacio Jesús Trujillo Cabrera and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:40, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EnglishDude98! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:40, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Quinn

Please do NOT create a mainspace article when one already exists in draft. You KNEW that the draft was present because you had edited it, so no excuses. Do not do it again. Giant Snowman 17:22, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kian Brechin

Hi, would like to echo the previous comment on here RE: creating main space articles already in the drafts. If you are unsure how to search the drafts you can use this link ^[1] Hildreth gazzard (talk) 13:55, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Tyrer (footballer, born 2001)

This is the third warning about the same issue you have been sent in a week. There was a user-space draft of Harry Tyrer (footballer, born 2001), you did not search for it, or ion you did you ignored it and created one in mainspace anyway. If this problem persists we will seek a topic ban from creating new articles. Giant Snowman 18:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There was not a user-space draft at all! None was showing when I created the page as it didn't say there was a draft of any sort. EnglishDude98 (talk) 18:38, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was at User:GiantSnowman/Harry Tyrer - created on 27 August, your mainspace article was 3 September. You need to search in user space as well as draft space - and you have just done the exact same thing at Jayden Luker, creating an article when an earlier draft already exists. Giant Snowman 18:01, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, the Luker article is not notable. If you move it to mainspace, it will be deleted - better to keep in draft for now. Giant Snowman 18:32, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Harvey Araujo

Not notable, again! Making your league appearance means NOTHING. You must meet WP:GNG to be notable. Giant Snowman 17:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok mate I'll stop and next time I will make sure a page is in the correct category, no need to make it a huge issue.

I've learnt my lesson and won't do it again.

Apologise EnglishDude98 (talk) 17:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But you did it earlier with Dylan Mitchell! Giant Snowman 17:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I only realised that now, from now on I will check the draft spaces before creating any articles from this day forward.

Let's draw a line under this and move on as it was an error on my part.

Once again I apologise EnglishDude98 (talk) 17:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft space and user space, please! Giant Snowman 18:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noted mate, I will do both moving forward, hope that's alright? EnglishDude98 (talk) 18:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you! Giant Snowman 20:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, why the HELL have you just created Dylan Mitchell when you KNOW that your previous version was moved into draft space and you will have received a notice telling you there was a draft?! Giant Snowman 20:31, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with GiantSnowman here. This is starting to become very disruptive, EnglishDude98. Please review WP:GNG, and remember not to make duplicate articles when there might already be one in draft or user space. Paul Vaurie (talk) 20:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Paul Vaurie: this is now at WP:ANI if you wish to comment there. I am now working through article creations and PRODding them. Giant Snowman 20:42, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am very sorry for being a pain to you all, however @Paul Vaurie I will stop making duplicate articles from NOW ON!

I feel like I am being mistreated by @GiantSnowman as I have looked on a few other pages and there's a few footballers who have the bare amount of references and hardly any significant information.

I create a few pages with a vast amount of references and they fail WP:GNG, YET I spend time finding the information as well as reliable sources to put into the articles.

Once again I apologise to you both; FOR THE LAST TIME I will no longer make pages that are in the draft space and I promise that on my life.

Let's all grow up, move on and start a fresh as it's all very petty this EnglishDude98 (talk) 22:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You said this previously and continued. You cannot be trusted. Giant Snowman 17:35, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can be trusted, I've not done it today have I? And this trend will continue now; if I do it again in the next few weeks then you can block me for sure. I will NOT create articles which already have drafts any longer, you can be sure of that.

END OF DISCUSSION! EnglishDude98 (talk) 19:32, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent conduct

I have raised this at WT:FOOTBALL for wider discussion, and in the hope you finally sit up and pay attention before your articles are deleted and/or you are blocked. Giant Snowman 17:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Giant Snowman 20:36, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Adrien Thibaut

The article Adrien Thibaut has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 20:41, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adrien Thibaut has made his professional debut for Crewe Alexandra; and I've put 13/14 references in this article - some contain significant backing to Thibaut's career and transfers!

It's a notable page and contains enough information on Adrien Thibaut from what I have searched very hard for online for various sources.

You're only proposing to delete the page as you have an issue with me and it's appalling how you have treated me on here EnglishDude98 (talk) 21:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jack Moore (footballer, born 2003)

The article Jack Moore (footballer, born 2003) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 20:46, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why you being like this? They are all fine in terms of content and Jack Moore has made his professional debut for Blackpool!

You are treating me very harshly and all for no reason whatsoever!

Everybody else makes pages and nothing happens to them and they hardly contain a huge amount of references

I WILL STOP IF YOU KEEP ALL THESE PAGES UP AND PLEASE STOP SIGNALLING ME OUT WHEN I HAVE DONE NOTHING WRONG! EnglishDude98 (talk) 21:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of George Murray-Jones

The article George Murray-Jones has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 20:47, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adrien Thibaut for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adrien Thibaut is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrien Thibaut until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Giant Snowman 17:47, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of George Murray-Jones

Hello EnglishDude98,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged George Murray-Jones for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want George Murray-Jones to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:04, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jack Moore (footballer, born 2003) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jack Moore (footballer, born 2003) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Moore (footballer, born 2003) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Giant Snowman 20:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack Henry-Francis (September 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jack Henry-Francis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 02:38, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joel McGregor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joel McGregor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel McGregor (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Giant Snowman 07:01, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Finn Ashworth for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Finn Ashworth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finn Ashworth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Giant Snowman 07:15, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Finn Ashworth . Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Giant Snowman 15:09, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mason Rees for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mason Rees is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mason Rees until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Giant Snowman 07:21, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lucas Sant for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lucas Sant is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucas Sant (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Paul W (talk) 09:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Felix Goddard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Felix Goddard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felix Goddard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Giant Snowman 19:54, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for failing to respond to concerns about your editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Barkeep49 (talk) 00:27, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you agree to respond, to the concerns raised about you at ANI and to abide by what you already agreed to do, the block can be immediately lifted. Barkeep49 (talk) 00:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Barkeep49 It won't let me comment on the ANI feed as you've blocked me for two weeks; but I do abide to what I'd agreed previously from this day forward and beyond. I will NOT create pages which are already in draft spaces from other users anymore and you have my word on that

Apologise and regards, EnglishDude98 (talk) 08:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have unblocked you. Barkeep49 (talk) 16:19, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, much appreciated

I will stick to my above agreement as mentioned above

Regards, EnglishDude98 (talk) 18:30, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Barkeep49: - the issue is not just duplicating articles, it's repeatedly creating non-notable articles. This user has zero concept of notability requirements, zero intention to learn, and given their conduct, zero intention to stop. Giant Snowman 18:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GiantSnowman that can be dealt with as part of the ANI discussion which is ongoing. Barkeep49 (talk) 18:41, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

...and which they have still not commented on... Giant Snowman 18:42, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They said above they tried but couldn't for my block. They haven't done anything since the unblock but post here. I agree they should comment at ANI. Barkeep49 (talk) 18:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GiantSnowman I've seriously learnt my lesson after the last few days in terms of creating non-notable articles. I won't bother making any more pages in that case; I will edit on pages which are notable.

Is that ok?

Regards, EnglishDude98 (talk) 18:44, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment at ANI. Giant Snowman 18:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have @GiantSnowman , I hope we can all move on from this and I am willing to learn from these mistakes which I've made in recent days. I will look more at the policies which are available and in future I will avoid doing non notable pages EnglishDude98 (talk) 18:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please review WP:GNG - and please do not create any articles or drafts. Giant Snowman 19:03, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok @GiantSnowman I will review WP:GNG in near future and will consult with you on whether or not I create pages or drafts again.

Is that ok?

Thanks, EnglishDude98 (talk) 19:05, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Giant Snowman 08:08, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And despite saying this, EnglishDude98 created another probably non notable footballer page the next day, Patrick Gamble (footballer) MarchOfTheGreyhounds 00:38, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kian Breckin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kian Breckin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kian Breckin (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Star Mississippi 20:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for failure to abide by the restrictions you agreed to when last unblocked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:46, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

facepalm*

Proposed deletion of William Fitzgerald (footballer, born 1999)

The article William Fitzgerald (footballer, born 1999) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 14:29, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wilson Waweru

The article Wilson Waweru has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 14:29, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marvin Kaleta

The article Marvin Kaleta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 14:29, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Owen Farmer

The article Owen Farmer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 14:29, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joe Young (footballer)

The article Joe Young (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 14:29, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paris Lock

The article Paris Lock has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 14:29, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Max Conway

The article Max Conway has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 14:29, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Owen Lunt for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Owen Lunt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owen Lunt (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Giant Snowman 14:31, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Patrick Gamble (footballer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Patrick Gamble (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Gamble (footballer) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Giant Snowman 14:33, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block Evading

Using an IP to decline the PRODs will not help your case for unblock should you request one. I have blocked the IP, but leave it to another editor to determine whether these PRODs should be restored as clearly in bad faith. (cc @Barkeep) Star Mississippi 17:20, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy to take to AFD. Giant Snowman 17:25, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

may be simpler than dynamic IPs, although I blocked the 64. Thanks on the tag @GiantSnowman. I couldn't find it easily. Star Mississippi 17:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks. Giant Snowman 17:50, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Star Mississippi: he is back socking, see Playdude1998 (talk · contribs) and 2A06:5902:180C:5800:F5C8:505B:253C:F6DE (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Giant Snowman 17:43, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @GiantSnowman for handling while I was offline. @Barkeep we're thoroughly into 3X territory here. Thoughts? Star Mississippi 02:41, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noting that Barkeep is a different editor from me. I'm a bit of a squish myself when it comes to 3X and would hope this editorial will cut it out. I will circle back to CU next time I'm on a computer. Barkeep49 (talk) 03:41, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CU offers no conclusion one way or another about whether we have all current socks. Barkeep49 (talk) 14:34, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noticed two edits (diff, diff) relating to Lucas Sant (Englishdude creation recently deleted via AfD). Paul W (talk) 16:11, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked the IP as a normal (non-CU) admin action given the clear behavioral links. Barkeep49 (talk) 16:26, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just noting continued block evasion, most recently at Max Conway which I have semi'ed in addition to blocking the 64. Star Mississippi 15:05, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Max Conway for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Max Conway is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max Conway until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Giant Snowman 17:29, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of William Fitzgerald (footballer, born 1999) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Fitzgerald (footballer, born 1999) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Fitzgerald (footballer, born 1999) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Giant Snowman 17:32, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Owen Farmer

The article Owen Farmer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:29, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paris Lock

The article Paris Lock has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:31, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marvin Kaleta

The article Marvin Kaleta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:09, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack Henry-Francis has been accepted

Jack Henry-Francis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ortizesp (talk) 14:11, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Max Conway has been accepted

Max Conway, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ortizesp (talk) 14:26, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

^ "Draft Search".

[1] "Draft Search".

[1]