User talk:Englishcoug

In response to your feedback[edit]

Try looking at Template:cite web. It will help you format your websites when you use them as references. good luck

Ryan shell (talk) 23:25, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Hello there. Let me know if you have any questions. My edit summary at Alzheimers stressed the importance of WP:MEDRS. I'd be happy to assist if you have any questions. Just contact me at my talk page. Thanks! Biosthmors (talk) 21:56, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that we don't like citing primary studies (unless they are high-quality randomized controlled trials published in respected journals). If you think the 2012 study meets this criterion, please cite it in the fashion of the example sentences in WP:MEDREV. Does that makes sense? I rewrote DVT last year. As you can see, I am citing updated review articles and clinical practice guidelines nearly exclusively. That's how medical articles here are supposed to be written. Biosthmors (talk) 22:09, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually MEDREV says "If the findings involve phase I or phase II clinical trials, small studies, studies that did not directly measure clinically important results, laboratory work with animal models, or isolated cells or tissue, then these findings are probably only indirectly relevant to understanding human health; in these cases, they should be entirely omitted." Disagree with that? Discuss at WT:MEDRS. Best. Biosthmors (talk) 22:26, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]