User talk:Enhazaam
Welcome![edit]
Hello Enhazaam, welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Liance, and I've been editing here for a while. I wanted to thank you for submitting Draft:Netanel Korin to WikiProject Articles for Creation and helping to grow the encyclopedia! We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:
- The Teahouse - ask Wikipedians for general editing help
- Articles for Creation Help Desk - ask reviewers for draft article help
- Creating your first article
- Referencing for beginners
- Wikipedia Manual of Style
I highly recommend visiting The Teahouse if you are unsure about anything Wiki related. It's a place where experienced editors answer questions and assist newcomers in the editing process. In addition, please do not hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome! I hope you enjoy your time here. ~Liancetalk 21:30, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Emanuel Milman has been accepted[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Chetsford (talk) 02:47, 17 June 2024 (UTC)- Thank you so much! I'm really happy!! Can you also go over three other drafts I wrote? Even if you don't publish them, at least give me comments. Enhazaam (talk) 07:04, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Rotem Oshman (June 18)[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rotem Oshman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Enhazaam!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:16, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Tzipi Horowitz-Kraus has been accepted[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
SL93 (talk) 00:38, 19 June 2024 (UTC)reply[edit]
He's clearly notable, but what you wrote was a poorly sourced hagiography, rather than a a neutral encyclopaedia article. When you write about a person
- you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.
- You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
- There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
- You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
Much of your text consists of opinions rather than verifiable facts, and doesn't alway confirm the claimed facts. For example, your paragraph David Goodblatt died on September 25, 2019, after being struck by a vehicle during his morning walk. He is survived by his wife Sasona, their children Keren, Michael, and Grace, and granddaughter Logan. Goodblatt was known for his nurturing nature, often sharing moments of warmth and encouragement with his students and colleagues. He left a lasting legacy in both his academic field and his community is sourced to comments made by friends and family on a legacy site. I'd be interested to know why you consider that a reputable, independent third-party source. Also, it doesn't confirm any of the claimed facts in the first sentence, and his character is irrelevant to his notablity. Saying how wonderful he was and attributing to friend and family comments on an obituary page is just flim-flam.
Similarly, your claim His scholarship significantly advanced the understanding of Jewish self-governance and nationalism in antiquity has three sources, none of which is an independent third-party sources, and none of which say what you claim, which would only be an opinion anyway. Everything is renowned, excelled, prestigious and so on.
If you think you can write this with proper sources and verified facts, and without the "He was wonderful" stuff, let me know and I'll sandbox it for you. Incidentally, books don't need references but should have an isbn Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:27, 25 June 2024 (UTC) a similar tone applies throughout, Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources.