User talk:Enigmar

Welcome!

Hello, Enigmar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! KillerChihuahua^?!? 11:30, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

When you see an administrator rollback (the edit summary is in the form of Reverted edits by Username(talk) to last version by Username, where Username is different user names or IPs, be sure that if the version being reverted to is vandalized, it is an error - due to multiple vandals or a timing issue. Please AGF and rather than place a vandal warning on the Admin's talk page, simply correct the error (without accusatory edit summaries) and if you wish to inform the Admin, a simple post with diffs, explaining that they accidentally reverted to a vandalized version and you fixed it, is sufficient. Also, note that vandal warnings, like other posts, go at the end or bottom of a talk page, not the top. Hope this helps! KillerChihuahua^?!? 11:30, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your warning on my page

It looks like I accidentally reverted Blue-footed Booby to a vandalized state. I can assure you that it is was not my intention to do so. I have never deliberately vandalized any page, and have reverted a great deal of vandalism over the past year. I have exercised my right to remove the warning fom my user page. -- Donald Albury 11:29, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dynacell

In the "Articles for Deletion" discussion you said:

When i have the time to do the research im going to create a better article on the company, Including history and photos of the battery package

Is there any indication that a notable company called Dynacell exists anyway?

(they do sell them at a nearby dollar store, and they are as described in the article.)

No doubt, but this doesn't make them notable; you need to demonstrate that this company exists and is not just an obscure pseudo-brand made up by a generic far-east battery manufacturer (or whatever). Of course, the "real" manufacturer themselves may be notable and deserve its own article, but that's a different issue.

I have personally tested the batteries, and under similar loads and conditions, they are having a life expectancy of 1/12th that of energizer. (lasting 12 hours powering a small led fashlight, compared to 140-150 with energizer)

Unfortunately, performing such tests yourself for Wikipedia is "Original research" and cannot be included here; please read the linked article to find out why.

Fourohfour 11:45, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]