User talk:Enormous Efrit

August 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of Katihar. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal Wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:49, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for making me familial with the guidelines. I completely understand and appreciate what you did. Every effort somebody do now will be fruitful in the future. Again thank you very much and I look forward to not make the same mistake again. Enormous Efrit (talk) 10:00, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Arjayay. I reviewed the changes and, well I am somewhat disappointed. First of all I am glad you removed the external links, but I not only changed the external links but also I updated them too. The links which were in the citations were broken and out dated. I did the research and updated them with the correct one's. Most of the links that are in the Education section are broken and they even take users to unsecure websites. So I just want to say please review the change someone made thoroughly instead of just reverting the whole edit. There may be something a bit off but you shouldn't just wholly revert it without seeing all the other changes. Also, I didn't knew that EL's were allowed in citations. When I was checking the citation it said that the citation just links to an EL and need additional verification. Whatsoever I hope we both will learn something from this. Thank you for your time. Enormous Efrit (talk) 10:15, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Enormous Efrit, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Enormous Efrit! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

December 2021[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:40, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Enormous Efrit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello administrators! First of all, I'll admit the truth. Yes, Enormous Efrit is my parent account. But after getting blocked for the second time at Enormous Efreet, I realised that being against the policies is not a good thing to do. I created the Trulio Drulio account solely for the purpose of making constructive edits. I realised how Wikipedia works behind the scenes, and was fascinated by the process and the determination of its editors. I wanted to become a valuable Wiki editor myself. If you go through my account logs or contributions at the newly created Trulio Drulio account, you will see that I've tried to be constructive and have not spread vandalism, nor will ever again. I am requesting a thorough review of my case, as Wikipedia Block policies state: "that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again, and you will make productive contributions instead". Even in the future, you can keep track of my habits and block me if I do spread vandalism. I promise you, that I once used to spread Vandalism, but now I fight it myself. I am a WikiBogeyman afterall. Pinging --jpgordon. Enormous Efrit (talk) 03:35, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We're not going to unblock you right after you create multiple sock puppets. Sock puppetry makes it look like you have contempt for our processes and rules, and you'll ignore them whenever you don't get your way. Try the standard offer if you want to convince us you can follow our rules. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:08, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.