User talk:Ericbonetti

The article Folio Advisor has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:45, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

• Deleted again -- please see WP:WEB and WP:CORP. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:58, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

June 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Auxiliary police. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MOOOOOPS (talk) 01:11, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Let me know where you want the evidence sent.

RE: Arlington County Auxiliary Article

What you are posting requires a source that backs up what you said. You can't just post these statements and then say it's verifiable, so the reader needs to go out and get the proof that backs up what your saying. Its your job to provide the source. If you want to add your statements again, provide a source that backs up everything you said. MOOOOOPS (talk) 20:50, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Verifiability says "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—that is, whether readers are able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether we think it is true. Editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or likely to be challenged, or the material may be removed."

It also says "The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material." To put it bluntly, you add info, you need to provide a source backing up what you said, otherwise an editor may remove the info added, which is what I did. MOOOOOPS (talk) 02:11, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Your request for rename

Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. @Kate (parlez) 23:11, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FolioInvestingLogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FolioInvestingLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 20 March 2019 (UTC)