User talk:Erik1987ghazaryan

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gagik Tsarukyan, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Serouj (talk) 15:57, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Gagik Tsarukyan

See the talk page. Serouj (talk) 09:33, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

There has already been a lengthy discussion about this issue, so please discuss if you have anything new to say there before deleting text, as that may be interpreted by some as vandalism. Serouj (talk) 09:35, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Gagik Tsarukyan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Serouj (talk) 09:36, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Like I said, before deleting text that has been sourced from reliable sources you must discuss first in the talk page. Blatantly deleting text continuously will only get you banned from Wikipedia. Please reinstate the deleted text so that no administrative action is taken against you. Serouj (talk) 10:03, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gagik Tsarukyan, you will be blocked from editing. Serouj (talk) 10:03, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Gagik Tsarukyan. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Serouj (talk) 17:53, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gagik Tsarukyan. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 06:50, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Dear Serouj. please don't speak like you have created wikipedia rules. If you want to have a talk in this issue, let's do it, but after only one thing. This offencive, slang and non-formal words shouldn't appear in wikipedia. Also his address shouldn't appear in top information. You already know that I think that address should appear in other place if it is important to you.

Right now I am deleting the offencive words. as they are against wikipedia rules.

Exactly what part of the article do you think contains "offensive words"? Write these in the talk page of the article. Serouj (talk) 07:10, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ruzan harutyunyan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ruzan harutyunyan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Porturology (talk) 09:27, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Notification

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Nyttend (talk) 20:21, 2 August 2011 (UTC)