User talk:Erlend79

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Dougweller (talk) 06:31, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for trying! It didn't go unnoticed[edit]

		The Outlaw Halo Award
		Thankyou for your attempt at bringing balance to the Leuchter report page despite the continued debate. Lostinlodos (talk) 01:53, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply] (about the award)

Actually it did did go unnoticed by Lostinlodos who didn't notice that you made sure that the footnotes at the bottom of the page, quotes saying it was a pseudo-scientific report, were place at the top of the page under the sentence fragment "The Leuchter report is a scientific" - making it 'in your face' that the report is pseudoscientific. True, but they belonged in the footnotes where I've restored them. Dougweller (talk) 06:30, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]