User talk:Eruvian

I wish all first pages looked like this. It's complete, concise, referenced, formatted and even categorized. Fantastic job, more than I can express. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 08:58, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Score

I've moved the page as you requested. It's quite easy just click on the 'move' tab at the top of the article, welcome to Wiki and happy editing.Paste _{Let’s have a chat.} 09:19, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Eruvian! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Paste _{Let’s have a chat.} 09:20, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Quality Score has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \byoutube\.com (links: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssegwi1w1l8, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8f1zr2uexo). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections.

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:24, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good question

It isn't really a speedy deletion candidate, so the best way to look to get it deleted is to post it on the "Articles for Deletion" page which you can find at WP:AFD. It's a pretty well-established article, but if it's redundant, we can get a community consensus and likely get it deleted. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:15, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why, thank you! Always glad to help. Please feel free to ask for it anytime you'd like. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:39, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another godd question. SanDisk is a notable company, but I don't know enough about the products in question to determine how important they are. The articles themselves are neutral and they do have some third-party references. Should be OK to stay IMO. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:16, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]