Jump to content

User talk:Esoser1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Esoser1, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Esoser1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GoingBatty (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 20 April 2021 (UTC)


Your submission at Articles for creation: Scattering CJ (April 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:58, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scattering CJ has been accepted

[edit]
Scattering CJ, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 04:48, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events

[edit]

Hi Esoser1. I just had some feedback regarding your very large and complicated edit to List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events, which I have reverted. This article is a Featured List. Which means it's been peer reviewed and accepted as one of Wikipedia's best pieces of content. While being bold is often encouraged, in this case as so many people have contributed to this article and agreed on the current formatting (which allowed it to become one of Wikipedia's best lists), it's not a good idea to make considerable changes to the article without obtaining consensus on the talk page first. You've also made a lot of very confusing changes and formatting errors, such as replacing the accepted reference parameter "url-status=" with the disused parameter "deadurl=". You can see your edit in the edit history of the article here: [1]. Scroll down to the reference section and have a look at all the red error messages that are a direct result of your edit. Also confusing is your desire to remove referenced information, again without obtaining any form of consensus first, your desire to remove archived links and your choice to add in unused parameters to references and more complicated URLs. Some of your individual changes do look like they may have been constructive, however, as you'd made an absolutely overwhelming number of changes at once it's simply too time-consuming to go through them all and try and see what ones are salvageable. I'd recommend not making so many changes at once in the future to any article, unless it's an article that has no other regular or involved contributors. You've clearly put a lot of effort into the change you made, and I'd hate to see so much of your time wasted again in the future. So I'd recommend not making major edits to featured content at all until you're more experienced at editing, I'd recommend not making major changes to popular articles without first obtaining consensus, and I'd also recommend making less changes at once so you can explain all the various changes you're making with the edit summary. Have a nice day. Damien Linnane (talk) 15:20, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scattering CJ (film) (June 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 03:37, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]