User talk:Eternal return of the same
unblock
Eternal return of the same (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have not "abused multiple accounts." What exactly is the evidence against me here?
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:58, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Eternal return of the same (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My block log says "abused multiple accounts." No message was posted on my talk page. I have not abused multiple accounts. Thus, the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia. I take issue with the prior admin's statement that my block "does not address the reason for my block." My block log says "abused multiple accounts", though no message was left explaining why I was accused of this, and I denied that I had done so, and asked what the evidence of this claim was. As such, my unblock request clearly addressed the reason for my block, by denying the allegations and asking what the evidence for them was. I ask again: would someone please share what the reason for the accusation against me is? I repeat: I have not "abused multiple accounts." Generally, it is considered a requirement of justice that the evidence be shared with the accused. Would someone care to do so? Eternal return of the same (talk) 13:30, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 14:46, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Additional Note for unblocking administrator: I believe that the administrators Oshwah and Yamla have both conducted themselves improperly here. Oshwah blocked me without giving me a chance to address the allegation or explaining his evidence for the block, despite repeated requests "What is the evidence against me?" and then reverted all my productive contributions to the project out of spite, despite having provided no evidence of any "abuse." Yamla conducted himself improperly by leaving a message that ostensibly "reviewed" my block but left a message that indicated he had not actually read my post, stating "you have not addressed the reason for your block." Since the block log stated "abused multiple accounts" and I denied having done this and asked what the evidence for this charge was, Yamla's statement that my unblock request "did not address the reasons for your block" was clearly false. Both of these administrators have engaged in administrative abuse, misconduct, and wanton misuse of their positions of power here through their utter failure to make accountable decisions which they are willing to explain. Eternal return of the same (talk) 13:37, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
{unblock| reason= No evidence was provided against me. Miscarriage of justice. Abuse of administrative power in secret proceedings where evidence not shared with accused. Help! }}