User talk:EthanM73

This is EthanM73's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chadwick Pelletier (November 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Storchy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are also appears to be a conflict of interest, or possible undeclared paid editing: the promotional photos used here were uploaded to Commons yesterday by an account called "KleanMedia".

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chadwick Pelletier and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Storchy (talk) 13:23, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022[edit]

You appear to have a close connection to the subject on Wikipedia that raises concerns about a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged.

Anyone with a conflict of interest must avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your family or colleagues, your organization or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Even if you are not being paid, you are expected to disclose any close connection with the subject of the article, using the connected contributor template.

For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you.

Storchy (talk) 13:23, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your feedback. I have close connection to the subject matter (festivals and film industry), but not the subject of this article. I believe I have created a neutral and properly cited article. That said, I do have tangential connection to those who covered the DaVinci International Film Festival, whom supplied the Commons images. If, for some reason, the request for open source images was in breech of wiki guidelines, then I am OK to delete them and/or qualify where they originated from. But I am in no way associated and/or connected to this subject, and the article remains neutral. Your guidance here is appreciated, thank you. EthanM73 (talk) 19:17, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Chadwick Pelletier has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Chadwick Pelletier. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 22:18, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Chadwick Pelletier[edit]

Hello, EthanM73. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chadwick Pelletier, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:08, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Chadwick Pelletier[edit]

Hello, EthanM73. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chadwick Pelletier".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:33, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]