User talk:Eveline123

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Zalora[edit]

Thanks for your message. Lots of companies stylise their names in all capitals on their website, but wikipedia still uses their name in standard English formatting, e.g. Time Magazine not TIME Magazine. So it is correct for it to be Zalora throughout the article, not ZALORA. For further explanation, see the link I provided in the edit summary - MOS:ALLCAPS and see also MOS:TMRULES. Thank you, Melcous (talk) 10:20, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Information icon Hello, Eveline123. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
  • instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Citobun (talk) 09:31, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Zalora[edit]

Information icon A tag has been placed on Zalora requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. TomStar81 (Talk) 10:15, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]