User talk:Everton61

Multiple accounts[edit]

Please note that I've blocked your account User:Everton62 as it was an undisclosed account being used to edit the same topics as your primary account contrary to our policies regarding multiple accounts. In addition, you have been adding apparently biased or opinionated material to the Brian Day article using these two accounts for years. Please be aware of our policies regarding reliable sourcing, original research and biographies of living persons.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:53, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop pushing a strong POV on Brian Day. If you continue to make promotional edits, you could end up blocked or topic banned. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:38, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Brian Day, you may be blocked from editing. You are clearly a single purpose account being used to advocate a specific point of view. This type of subjective and advocate editing is not allowed on Wikipedia. Please ensure you read through the policies linked on this page and I strongly suggest you use the article talk page to suggest changes as opposed to editing the article directly.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:20, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:59, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]