Jump to content

User talk:Everwill

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

My nickname was Everwill. I lasted about 5 hours before being banned for making a comment on a discussion page. I was banned because someone thinks that my opinions are similar to a user named Raspor. There is no possibility that the administrators have made an error and I am disallowed from proving my reality. I think it would be a good idea to post a warning that anyone who posts suggestions on the discussion page of Intelligent Design will be banned unless they support the article in its current format.

I am starting to wonder if the people who edit the Intelligent Design article are employed by some faction who is actively trying to supress this information.

BTW, I just got a call from a RESTRICTED number a few moments ago. The guy who called me claimed to be 55 years old and living in Cleveland. He said his name was Raspor. He wanted to know what I was going to do next. I said probably nothing. This is a pointless fight. I'm not trying to prove or disprove ID, and Wikipedia is not paying me to monitor the children who are fighting over this site. I've only been using Wikipedia a few months now, but I'm very thankful that I never relied on it for anything important.

I fully expect this to be editted away because someone else might discover that I'm a real person and not a troll or a sock-puppet. Feel free to email me or call me. My email address is Will AT Nesbitt on the Web (all one word) DOT com. I'll send you my phone number if you can't find it in previous postings.

Meanwhile, have at it kiddies.

I'm done, but I predict that my "sock puppets" will return. At least that's how it will appear to those who are so naive to think that there is a single psychotic individual carrying the opposition banner against intelligent design. 70.177.180.111 19:58, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PS. Check the real estate records for Fairfax County Virginia in the USA. (They're online.) My address is 6619 Skyline Ct. Alexandria VA two two three Oh seven. Then check Ebay (or the web) and search for a book called "Battlestorm" by Ral Partha Publishing. Then check the phone records (www.superpages.com). Maybe this is all part of Raspor's elaborate hoax. Preplanned from the beginning.

Does this sound like I admitted to being some guy from Cleveland who is opposed to ID?

Email Exchange[edit]

Here's an interesting email exchange. I'm posting this without his permission, so I editted out his email out of respect for the other user's privacy.:


> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: is this will from wikipedia??
> From: (REDACTED) <****@yahoo.com>
> Date: Fri, January 26, 2007 2:39 pm
> To: Will Nesbitt <will@nesbittontheweb.com>
> > no dont post any of this. i am raspor. i really dont want those psychos to know anything about me. they have group paranoia. see they think you are someone else. me, raspor. but whoever now who presents a pro-ID view will be tagged a raspor sockpuppet and banned. its a great way to control everything. sort of like when hitler accused a jew of buringing the riechstag and then banned all jews. nice talking to you stay in touch.

>

> Will Nesbitt <will@nesbittontheweb.com> wrote: I was banned just banned permanently. What a bunch of retards. Where
> are you and who are you? I'd like to post this on my user page.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Will Nesbitt
> Ask me about real estate investments & mortgage strategies.
> > 703 765 0300 ext. 223 (office)
> 301 567 0300 ext. 110 (office 2)
> 703 765 5070 (fax)
> 571 237 7902 (mobile)
>
>
>
>
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: is this will from wikipedia??
> > From: (REDACTED)
> > Date: Thu, January 25, 2007 7:03 pm
> > To: will@nesbittontheweb.com
> > > > yes i was banned too just for saying that ID could possibly be thougth of as science. this is one of the post biased things i have seen
> >
> > Be a PS3 game guru.
> > Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games. > > > > > Don't be flakey. Get Yahoo! Mail for Mobile and > always stay connected to friends.

If you're not Raspor, how do you explain this?[edit]

If you are not Raspor evading a community ban as you claim above, then how do you account for your statement, "I won't be surprised if I get blocked again or even if I get a lifetime ban again..." [1]? FeloniousMonk 20:52, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block reviewed[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Everwill (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Mistaken identity / overzealous editors attacking uncomfortable POV's. On my user page I provide extensive proof of my real identity and I take ownership of everything I ever posted. I don't think I ever posted anything which can be considered out of bounds. I will also claim ownership of the IP's at my home office and various local offices. I do not claim ownership of Raspor's postings. I was "bitten" by ferocious long-time users. Please see my discussion page.

Decline reason:

Appears to be a sockpuppet or meatpuppet of banned User:Raspor. Everwill, please feel free to e-mail me to discuss which previous accounts you've used, but this on-wiki disruption has to end. SlimVirgin (talk) 21:01, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Everwill (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Mistaken identity / overzealous editors attacking uncomfortable POV's. On my user page I provide extensive proof of my real identity and I take ownership of everything I ever posted. I don't think I ever posted anything which can be considered out of bounds. I will also claim ownership of the IP's at my home office and various local offices. I do not claim ownership of Raspor's postings. I was "bitten" by ferocious long-time users. Please see my discussion page.

Decline reason:

Confirmed abusive sockpuppet of 70.108.89.17 (talk · contribs) at least (that IP address is blocked), see here, and it seems likely that this person is in actuality Raspor, though this is not (afaik) confirmed. To other admins, this unblock review was made at the same time as SlimVirgin's and does not count against the two-unblock-review limit. -- Yamla 21:04, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Final warning[edit]

Everwill, further to my recent e-mails, I unblocked you recently on condition that you stay away from ID, its talk page, and related pages for a few weeks, and my understanding was that you agreed to do that. Not only have you continued to post to the ID talk page, but it's the only page you're posting on, which strengthens the suspicion that you're acting as the meatpuppet of a banned user. You're welcome to edit in other areas of Wikipedia, but if you post to the ID talk page again, or any related page, I'm afraid you're likely to be blocked without further warning. SlimVirgin (talk) 22:19, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is like Craiglist, but at least on Craigslist they don't have any encyclopedic pretensions. Please ban me. This site is a waste of my time and I think I have proven quite clearly who is the problem on the Intelligent Design article. If you think I'm the problem, then I very much encourage you to block/ban me. I've already provided my name, address, phone number, tax records, Ebay account and more. I won't go through the charade of justice again. Everwill 23:04, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block[edit]

As you posted again to the ID talk page after the last warning, I've blocked this account indefinitely. SlimVirgin (talk) 05:40, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]