User talk:Excel access

October 2010

Your recent edit to the page Laghman Province appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. AtticusX (talk) 16:37, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Ghazni Province. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. AtticusX (talk) 16:39, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Pashto and other language/culture edits

Howdy, you need to provide sources which back up your claims. You're removing content with sources, and replacing them with assertions without sources. If you can discuss your edits instead of just reverting the content over and over, you might get somewhere. Otherwise you will simply be blocked and (if that doesn't work) the articles protected from editing. Discussion is a much better option. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns. --TeaDrinker (talk) 18:53, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

(Let me also note, Wikipedia does not look kindly on the creation of new accounts to evade blocks or escape scrutiny. The block on your primary account has expired. I think it would be best if you stick with that one.) --TeaDrinker (talk) 18:54, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

October 2010 (2)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Afghanistan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.

You removed a large part of the article, giving no reason and without any discussion in the talk page. --Enric Naval (talk) 15:04, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Afghanistan, you may be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 22:34, 20 October 2010 (UTC)