Jump to content

User talk:Ezhilarasan446

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Ezhilarasan446, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Empty Buffer (talk) 07:49, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Suryavarman II, you may be blocked from editing. William Thweatt TalkContribs 20:17, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hi,

Is Suryavarman khmer language name ?

Suryavarman name came from india orgin language. specially from tamil . Suriyan means Sun. varman is common surname of pallava kings who are ruled northern part of Tamilnadu. once pallava dynasty ended on 9th century(2nd–9th) by chola kings in tamilnadu. their rule started on another part of south asia.

please refer following pages

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pallava_dynasty

www.thehindu.com --Oldest news paper in india.

http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-features/tp-sundaymagazine/across-space-and-time/article661423.ece

Really? People can call themselves anything they choose. The linguistic origin of a name has nothing to do with the ethnic or geographic origins of the person bearing the name. My name is William, does that mean I am a Norman invader from France? Or a Holy Roman Prince destined to become the ancestor of the Netherlands Monarchy? Or maybe a Gaelic King of Scotland? No, it just means my parents named me William. The Khmer Empire (and in fact, most of Southeast Asia) was heavily influenced by the Indian culture of the time and adopted Sanskrit as a language of religion and government. Consequently, Khmer kings chose their royal names from Sanskrit. It implies no relationship other than that of admiration for the language or culture. See also Regnal name.--William Thweatt TalkContribs 22:39, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hi William,

I accept you naming formula is not for geographic origins. why I quoted name also. people of the nation can have any name. but kings mostly follow their surname from kingdom origin. 1000 years before the name "varman" popularly used on pallava kings. Pallava's official languages are Tamil,Sanskrit and language where they rule (eg.Khmer).

1) [Some quotes from thehindu.com newspaper links] http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-features/tp-sundaymagazine/across-space-and-time/article661423.ece

"This huge majestic monolithic image, recently restored and now kept at the entrance of Angkor Wat, is almost identical, in stylistic features,
to the image within the sanctum of the Ashtabhuja Perumal Temple of Kanchi(capital of pallava)"
"It is well known that the use of the honorific title Varman — very common amongst the Pallava kings — was borrowed by the kings of Cambodia. 

The first Cambodian king to have this suffix appended to his name was Bhadravarman who lived in the fourth century and thus, was a contemporary of one of the early Pallava rulers of Kanchipuram"

"The beautiful temple of Banteay Srei, around 30km from Angkor Wat,
has many intricately carved Hindu sculptures betraying South Indian influence.
Here, one can see the dancing Shiva (Nataraja) above the main doorway leading to the central sanctum. Close to him, 

there is a small, frail female figure that has been identified as Karaikal Ammaiar, the well-known Tamil saint."

"While Sanskrit language and literature spread to Cambodia from different parts of India including South India,
the ornate Grantha (also called Pallava Grantha) script travelled to Cambodia exclusively from the Pallava kingdom. According to scholars, 
some of the birudas (titles) of the Pallava kings including Mahendravarman I appear to be in the Khmer language — the language of Cambodia. 
Further, Nandivarman Pallavamalla, one of the later Pallava rulers,
is believed to have lived in Cambodia for some years before he travelled to Kanchi to ascend the Pallava throne"

2) In Cambodia history,Chenla_Kingdom (550–706) ruled before Khmer empire. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chenla_Kingdom

Some quotes

"The Chenla kingdom was influenced by the cultures of the south Indian Pallava dynasty and Chalukya dynasty"

3) First name(angkor) of Angkor Wat is derived from Tamil language. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angkor_Wat

"Angkor Wat, means Temple City or City of Temples in Khmer; Angkor, meaning city or capital city,
is a vernacular form of the word nokor (នគរ), which comes from the Sanskrit word nagara (नगर)"

nagar is tamil word.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nagar

"Nagar, a term that means settlement in Sanskrit and other Indo-Aryan languages which was derived from the Tamil word Nagaram (நகரம்) means city"

4) https://in.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070626112137AAY1MzJ

5)

"If Surriyavarman is follow Indian culture , Tamil kings from south india (Chola,chera,pandiya,pallava) only traveled out of India specially in south asia. 

many of the asian countries name derived from tamil language ( malasia,singapore)."

6)

please search more articles related to suriyavarman Whether he is tamilking or angkor wat built by tamil king

https://www.google.co.in/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=angkor wat built by tamil king ?

https://www.google.co.in/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=suryavarman ii is tamil king?

Your contributed article, எரிக்சன்[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, எரிக்சன். First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Ericsson. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Ericsson – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. BiH (talk) 20:34, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Suryavarman II, you may be blocked from editing. William Thweatt TalkContribs 09:15, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi William,

It is not personal thoughts.Previously I gave many references. It is hidden history. please study more about Pallava_dynasty. There are similar kings in culture,building.He ruled only with different kingdom name. but their origin is from pallava.

All content in Wikipedia articles must be backed up by reliable sources. There is no scholarly source for this ridiculous notion of yours. Yes, the various kingdoms of Southeast Asia were influenced by Indian thought in the areas of religion, government and culture, that is well-known, but that's as far as any connection goes. Every link you've provided simply says that Angkor (like other contemporary polities) was influenced by Indian thought of the era. None of them say that the Khmer kings were Tamil...that is ludicrous on the face of it and no scholar anywhere in the world (not even in India) would say that. You have been warned already, making such edits without sources to back them up (and that, in fact, contradict every existing source) is considered disruptive editing and you can be blocked for such behavior. Please read and understand No Original Research, synthesis and What is a "Reliable Source" for further guidance.--William Thweatt TalkContribs 10:16, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing[edit]

Please do not remove sourced content, just because you don't like it. If you have a source that disagrees with these sources, feel free to add it to the article. utcursch | talk 18:08, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]