User talk:Eztli

This page is empty.

Y helo thar! Dusso Janladde 13:08, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

This page is not empty.

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Snopes 040406.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Snopes 040406.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 16:01, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Citation needed template

Please do not add the {{fact}} or {{citationneeded}} template all over articles, like you did on Fore (golf). If you tihnk this is helping in ANY way, you are WRONG. It makes the article too blocky, hard to read, and anybody who is looking for information on the page won't find it. Just put a {{Unreferenced|(date)}} tag at the top. It does the same thing, and it looks 300,00,000% better. Violask81976 18:57, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Pencil fixes

Thanks for fixing the Pencil article on my behalf, my save must have aborted half way through, I'm not sure why it got cut off. RFerreira 07:00, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:DEViANCE-640x240.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:DEViANCE-640x240.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:12, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Doom gibs.png

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Doom gibs.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:19, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:INCBBS2_COM.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:INCBBS2_COM.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 00:55, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:United States One Dollar Bill 2003.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:United States One Dollar Bill 2003.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. OsamaK 13:11, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kasperskypersonal.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kasperskypersonal.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Reloadednfo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Reloadednfo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:38, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Fantom

I've declined your {{db-bio}} request on Fantom. "Created by its subject" is not a deletion reason, let alone a speedy deletion criterion – despite what a lot of people think, we have no policy against autobiographies. Besides, User:TheFantomMan could just as well be a fan of the band as a member of the band. The appearances in a film and multiple album releases claimed in the article are enough of an assertion of notability that CSD A7 doesn't apply. – iridescent 14:35, 10 August 2008 (UTC)