User talk:F.Charlotte

This is F.Charlotte's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: ORAZI (July 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Krishna Chaitanya Velaga was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Failure of WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. Apart from notability issues, there many grammatical errors in the draft and the tone seems to appear as a press release and also partly written in French.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ORAZI and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 02:45, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! F.Charlotte, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 02:45, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, F.Charlotte. You have new messages at Krishna Chaitanya Velaga's talk page.
Message added 09:57, 2 August 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Thanks for improving the article. It is very well written. But there is an issue with the references. AS WP:REF there references must be verifiable i.e the reviewers are ought to have access to the cited sources. But as I can see, most of the references you have provided are a accessible. Please provide links to them and if not possible get them verified by an OTRS request. You can request it at WP:OTRS. Regards, KC Velaga ✉ 09:57, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Krishna Chaitanya Velaga: Please see Wikipedia:Offline sources. OTRS can not verify offline sources, and there's no such requirement on Wikipedia. Verifiability means that some editors can verify the information (if required) by accessing the sources assuming that they have appropriate access. It does not require that all editors be able to easily verify the sources. If you have serious doubts about a specific source or you can't even verify that the source exists, you could possibly request at WP:RX to gain access via someone else. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:18, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:ORAZI has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:ORAZI. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:58, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ORAZI (September 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Comments to reviewers should not be included in the article body. The comments are "below the line" and are in the article body. Please take note of the other comments. Do not use Wikipedia as a reference. If you are having difficulty with the English, request assistance in copy-editing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ORAZI and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:13, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, F.Charlotte. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]