User talk:FPOS05

April 2021[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Warwickshire Fire and Rescue Service, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. 10mmsocket (talk) 16:06, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Warwickshire Fire and Rescue Service, you may be blocked from editing. Please take a look at the article's talk page. Hopefully that will help you understand why you can't paste stuff based on personal knowledge. 10mmsocket (talk) 16:22, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:00, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FPOS05 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not a "sockpuppet" account, a legitimate user. Reason for allegation is for other users doing the same sort of things that I am, which is the case. This is not one person, but lots of people individually. Comments posted on area I was editing I was unaware of as I had not sen the "talk" segment before.FPOS05 (talk) 17:19, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This doesn't account for why a lot of individual people are doing the same inappropriate thing. You'll need to specifically address that. Yamla (talk) 17:31, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FPOS05 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

a facebook group with multiple people with someone asking for help and explanation with this, where i would agree.FPOS05 (talk) 17:36, 19 April 2021 (UTC) ban was also unjustified by another administrator due to a warning being given, with me doing nothing between the warning and the ban.FPOS05 (talk) 17:57, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What you are describing is what we call meat puppetry and is forbidden. Regarding the block warning - no warning needs to be given for this type of block. PhilKnight (talk) 20:09, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.