User talk:FSGCalthorpe

Welcome!

Hello, FSGCalthorpe, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as "Review 31", may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 15:40, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of "Review 31"

The article "Review 31" has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable as far as I can see. May fall under WP:A7

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 15:40, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Review 31" moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, "Review 31", does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

Please review our guidelines for editors with a conflict of interest. Since you are employed by this publication, we ask that articles be submitted through the Articles for Creation process rather than being created in mainspace.

None of the sources appear to be about the company.

– Thjarkur (talk) 16:08, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Review 31

Hello, FSGCalthorpe. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

Hello GSGCalthorpe, you need to declare your COI. Pls read the above message, go to the links and read the instructions. Cassiopeia^(talk) 11:53, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:Cassiopeia. Thanks for drawing this to my attention. I have updated my user page and this article's talk page to declare my COI. FSGCalthorpe (talk) 11:59, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GSGCalthorpe, thank you for disclosing your COI in your user page and the article talk page. I have added a space after "Review" and before "31" on your user page disclosure. Do note (1) when the page is finally reviewed and accepted in Draft space and in mainspace, then you can remove the word "Draft:" on your user declaration tag and just keep the article name. (2). In regardless if the subject is notable and the content comply with WP:PROVEIT, WP:GNG, WP:NPOV and WP:COI disclosure, all COI affected articles need to go through WP:AfC (draft space for review first) and must not move to mainspace prior. Let me know if you have any questions for I am here to help. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia^(talk) 12:14, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much Cassiopeia: I appreciate it. I'm getting the hang of things as I edit so I really appreciate this kind of guidance. I'll let you know if I have any more questions. FSGCalthorpe (talk) 12:22, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Review 31 (May 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by RoySmith were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please read WP:NCORP and in particular WP:SIRS to learn about what makes a good source. A quick scan of the references shows twitter and facebook used as sources; these are both WP:UGC and thus not WP:RS. I spot-checked two references in what are usually considered good sources: The Guardian is a list of articles written by the editor of review 31. The Irish Times is just a passing mention. As noted above, WP:SIRS will explain why nether of these are useful.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Review 31 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Review 31, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 17:59, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FSGCalthorpe! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- RoySmith (talk) 17:59, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Review 31 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Review 31. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 23:15, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Review 31

Hello, FSGCalthorpe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Review 31".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:31, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Looking forward to working on this draft over Christmas. FSGCalthorpe (talk) 13:58, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]