User talk:FabioRomanoni

Academic.edu links and COI

Stop adding these links. They are not reliable sources, they are unpublished academic papers (not PhD thesis) with no indication about quality or reliability. Furthermore you are adding papers for a single author, Fabio Romanoni, which is a WP:COI (Conflict of Interest) with your account name. And you are using multiple accoutns (see User: Markkv) which is a blockable offense. Moreso you are inserting trivial information about small locations in Italy into the middle of paragraphs about larger topics simply to get as many cites as you can without consideration for how the paragraph reads or the context, it actually makes the articles worse. You are adding citations for the purpose of citing yourself, rather than doing what is best for Wikipedia. Finally this is all in the public record your reputation can be damaged, Wikipedia is not a place to promote yourself. -- GreenC 18:55, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

hello, since you wrote me personally, I answer you personally. The links inserted by Fabio Romanoni come from my publications, published and published in renowned historical journals, I invite you to check, there is nothing new and these are works often verified by anonymous referees from universities in different European countries. To talk about a topic you need to know it, those that may seem small places in Italy, in the Middle Ages maybe they weren't, and therefore you need to visualize the statements. London is now much larger and more important than Florence, but centuries ago it was not the same thing. If I made mistakes, I thank you for telling me, and in the spirit of the project, I will improve and do better--FabioRomanoni (talk) 20:27, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, FabioRomanoni

Thank you for creating Basilica of Santissimo Salvatore.

User:ComplexRational, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|ComplexRational}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

^Complex/_Rational 19:53, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks FabioRomanoni (talk) 20:09, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Citation Format

Concerning your edit at Aistulf. The original link you posted did not work and was unhelpful, so it was deleted accordingly. If you would be so kind, please make contributions consistent with the existing format used on the page. I have corrected your entry accordingly. Since I am not particularly competent in Italian (although I can navigate it some from my knowledge of ancient Latin), and you are likely a native speaker or heritage one at that, can you identify the exact page number for the Aistulf reference? Thanks. Obenritter (talk) 13:54, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for specifying the page. Your contribution is appreciated.--Obenritter (talk) 14:18, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I have entered the page number, there is a table with other royal burials listed, even some archaeological excavations that will start soon may perhaps reveal something new! thanks FabioRomanoni (talk) 14:27, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It seems the more we dig, the more clarity we find. It always pleases me when the archeological discoveries match the ancient texts, whereas the inverse presents problems. But hey, that's the nature of the beast as evidence is evidence.--Obenritter (talk) 14:39, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

He is profoundly right, I know scholars who are doing this project (https://www.monasteriimperialipavia.it/?lang=en), little is said about it on the site because the excavation will be done in autumn, but at San Salvatore they may have found the tombs of the kings of the Bavarian dynasty, of other remains, such as those of King Liutprand , DNA studies are also underway. We will see! thanks again for the comments! FabioRomanoni (talk) 14:58, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information Fabio and keep me updated if you don't mind. It seems we share an intense interest in this period. --Obenritter (talk) 19:15, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Casa degli Eustachi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Casa degli Eustachi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources to demonstrate notability. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MB 03:33, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Lombardia (wine) into Lombardy. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 20:27, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, in the Lombardy article the agriculture chapter, where he talked about wines, was very lacking because he only mentioned Franciacorta, while the article Lombardia (wine) is much more complete. I admit I was wrong by copying some lines of the text of the Lombardy article (wine) and inserting them in the Lombardy article. I try to postpone it. Thanks FabioRomanoni (talk) 08:45, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Casa degli Eustachi has been accepted

Casa degli Eustachi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

_Signed, Pichemist ^{( Contribs | Talk )} 14:59, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I thank you! FabioRomanoni (talk) 15:40, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, FabioRomanoni. Thank you for your work on Church Santa Maria Gualtieri. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:54, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I still have a lot to learn, but I’m trying to do articles about things I’ve been studying for years. Thank you. FabioRomanoni (talk) 08:41, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Parco naturale lombardo della Valle del Ticino

Ciao, per la mappa prova a guardare, su Wikipedia in italiano, it:Template:Area protetta#Wikidata, mentre per Wikipedia in inglese prova a leggere le istruzioni del Template:Infobox protected area. Un saluto. LukeWiller (talk) 21:10, 8 July 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Non-attributed translations

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from it:Parco naturale lombardo della Valle del Ticino to another page. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. For example:

Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. C F A 💬 19:30, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @CFA, thank you, but the matter is actually a little more complex: the article Parco naturale lombardo della Valle del Ticino did not exist in English, I translated it from the Italian article, but since the Italian article was not very well written and lacked references, I have added several paragraphs and many references to the English version. At this point, since the new article in English was better than the one in Italian, I decided to improve the article in Italian (if you check the history of the article in Italian you can see all the changes I made). So at this point the article Parco naturale lombardo della Valle del Ticino in the English version is not a translation of the original article in Italian, But it is for the most part a new article that was used by me to improve and modify also the article in Italian. I hope I’ve been clear. FabioRomanoni (talk) 21:38, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @CFA, thank you, but the matter is actually a little more complex: the article Parco naturale lombardo della Valle del Ticino did not exist in English, I translated it from the Italian article, but since the Italian article was not very well written and lacked references, I have added several paragraphs and many references to the English version. At this point, since the new article in English was better than the one in Italian, I decided to improve the article in Italian (if you check the history of the article in Italian you can see all the changes I made). So at this point the article Parco naturale lombardo della Valle del Ticino in the English version is not a translation of the original article in Italian, But it is for the most part a new article that was used by me to improve and modify also the article in Italian. I hope I’ve been clear. FabioRomanoni (talk) 21:40, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]