User talk:FabriceCanel

October 2018[edit]

Hello, FabriceCanel, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. GAB^gab 03:11, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I do not use multiple accounts, I have only this account.— Preceding unsigned comment added by FabriceCanel (talk • contribs) 04:20, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, FabriceCanel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
How to add those all-important references
Simplified Manual of Style
The Signpost, our newspaper.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! User:Vanischenu (talk) 22:42, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming pages[edit]

Hey, I think it is better if you would discuss in article's talk page and reach a consensus before proceeding with renaming an established article. Also see WP:Article titles for the naming conventions. Again, welcome and happy editing! User:Vanischenu (talk) 22:42, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: IndexNow (April 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Topic simply isn't notable. I did a check and found the only sources that could potentially be used are the SEO blogs which are already in the draft. These would not work to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:IndexNow and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 23:39, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]