User talk:Factrefresher

Welcome!

Hello Factrefresher, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 16:10, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation notification

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Krizpo. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:36, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

WTF IS WRONG WITH YOU!!? I HAVE MADE EVIDENTICAL CLAIMS TO MY CONTRIBUTIONS AND YOU JUST BLOCK ME!?Factrefresher (talk) 18:10, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

As I've explained to your previous accounts, Wikipedia does not want unsourced claims, Wikipedia does not cite sources that cite Wikipedia, and Wikipedia does not make claims beyond what is found in sources. Your continued failure with those regards are part of the reason why we caught you again. Ian.thomson (talk) 18:14, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

IT'S BECAUSE YOU SEE THIS IP ADRESS, NOT BECAUSE OF MY ARTICLES. I'VE SEEN THE PREVIOUS CONTRIBUTIONS ON THESE TOPICS AND MANY ARTICLES DO HAVE RELIABLE SOURCES SUCH AS REUTERS. Factrefresher (talk) 19:14, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

I can't see your IP address at all, but your admission that you have the same IP address seals the deal: you're a blocked editor trying to evade his block. That alone is enough reason to block you and revert your material. Your additions this time cited sources that were not as good as Reuters, and even then one good apple does not unspoil the rotten basketful. Ian.thomson (talk) 19:17, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

DON'T BE AN IDIOT. IF YOU DIDN'T SEE MY IP ADRESS YOU WOULDN'T HAVE "CAUGHT ME". IT'S STILL NOT A REASON TO BLOCK ME. BETTER JUST REVERT THE ARTICLES OF RELIGION IN AFRICA AND THE MIDDLE EAST. AND GIVE A HEADS UP.Factrefresher (talk) 19:33, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

BUT THE FACT IS, THOSE RELIGIONS DO HAVE A HISTORY IN BOTH TERRITTORIES. AND CHRISTIANITY IN SOUTH KOREA HAS BEEN STEADILY DECLINING IN FAVOUR OF KOREAN SHAMANISM ACCORDING TO KOREAN STATISTICS AND REUTERS.Factrefresher (talk) 19:35, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

There really is no point in you continuing to post. We did catch you because you wrote just like you did last time, and made pretty much the exact same bad edits. You also just admitted to having the same IP address. Lay off the pot, and maybe you'll figure out that we've told you how to not get caught. Ian.thomson (talk) 19:40, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

You are dumb. You think I am the same as Krizpo. You better unblock me.